Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D0C110216 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80624 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2013 20:58:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 80592 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2013 20:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 80584 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2013 20:58:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:58:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-ie0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:58:37 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so27471083iec.13 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NggWZPTGDyA6TtAH2iCkv7YKCFnQkps/DooQHN/YdiI=; b=lpRkOslWLdaioN6StpMq8WTSdwfNxoqmJqExr0cWnqyaZxoY3Vc09oMsHJvpX/XTMV wPp53h0KGyC5YvReyrSafDozlmkkHTkFdGP4RDjyPU02Ufr5gG8KWdNPH56Zl2PIzKPr Ss/P8dC8NnIahdTtpWVeE2XmmJpuFm5TXSNc6zNnqIY2TQwKS501IcCRHapoA9J7/y2v xTsi6bg4aApvN8ZsFUEMPATRq6AJctcyEJ38J22SRUzUwlEFRdAsfMTiQghXPtCv4+f+ aAy6UvyyLHyztYVYwQeODnF+Cyhz0bhlp7Sz/ijxSK8wtH6xe0IvjzbXFid9/SZeG0cH 6x8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.20.232 with SMTP id q8mr8343902ige.0.1373921896887; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.222.197 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:58:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:58:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8Idw8hvBOyvvSpYUMvjATMJFkZs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Getting Organized for 3.0 From: Brian LeRoux To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That sounds better to me. Steve is going to verify and tag the plugin repos to 3.0.0 today. The tacit agreement we've been discussing was that plugins would then only be updated tag wise when they themselves are updated. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Andrew Grieve >> wrote: >> > We really need to have a plan for this release, so here goes: >> > >> > 1. How to tag plugins: >> > - Voting via tagging won't work here since each plugin has multiple >> > platforms. >> > - Let's create a sub-task for each plugin, and have each platform add a >> > comment to the sub-task when they have "signed off" on it. Once all >> > platforms have been tested / signed-off, then it can be tagged. >> >> Sounds good. >> > > I no longer think this sounds good :P. Talked it through a bit with Ian / > David / Max. Let's continue on with the existing JIRA issue, which has a > "Tag $PLATFORM" entry. > As a part of tagging your platform, you are signing off on having tested > all of the plugins on your platform (aka, the same testing process that we > had before). > Once all of the platforms are tagged, we can use coho to bulk tag all of > the plugin repos. > > >> >> > >> > 2. With this many repos, it's not easy getting them all back to the >> correct >> > state / tag that they are supposed to be in for a release. For this >> reason, >> > I think the .zip to apache servers *should* contain a snapshot of all >> > platforms & plugins. This way it's easy to get a "3.0" snapshot for the >> > forever future. >> >> I don't think we'll get agreement on this, but I have no feelings >> either way. As long as we're following the Apache Way, it sounds >> good! >> >> > >> > 3. Tagging / voting on platform repos. isn't that meaningful until >> plugins >> > are all tested. Let's hold off tagging platform repos until all plugins >> > repos are signed off. >> >> Fair enough! >> >> > >> > If anyone feels strongly that we should go about this another way, please >> > be responsive since we need to get the release train rolling. JIRA >> > release-bug creating was added to coho last week, so I may close the bug >> > Fil just created and use the script to create one with all plugins added >> to >> > it. >> >> If this is easier, sure. My only concern is that we have less than >> three days left to get this out in reality. I know that I'll be >> driving to PDX on Thursday, so I'm going to be unable to do anything >> for most of they day so I won't be around for tagging the final >> release if we do it then. >>