Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44D9A102AE for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3603 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2013 19:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 3280 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2013 19:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 3272 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2013 19:55:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-wg0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:55:49 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so2042933wgh.7 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XZFZbPjqr5UFLxPtgUiCKxQ3PPHXb8ggwD4LSrG8H3M=; b=AiXMn0nBVeecEzcHVVg7yWf8gKRqZbUPH57S2Pz4GagJKVKb69Be5rmJjv1jgoX7jX 6qJOtmHrc0Np7V8M76EzgvSscR4ddvOYaXz7hEdSJwR3wnyDjSY14ZocYb5tnE4UAlV4 UVXJnrOSpsd+ahOpyDEHy63kLr1Z8BU8lSJBOvpbHMxrf06uNQNTW06tYrrKKGCwDFe0 Ej0Pf8mmGa41ATYexI5rZwJ6kB72ynJa6Pnj/QhgM8JEAYGoUgiui6SuzpGdfJ82F1Hm R07SbBVXHzsYvK7hWkaVt4aF4kbkeZ8l78pABfFNL55xzDb2xOJezcx9rQRBmBl7B8CA TaJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XZFZbPjqr5UFLxPtgUiCKxQ3PPHXb8ggwD4LSrG8H3M=; b=A2jPuIbMTbt1I6+c3mHZiwz1RmCatJ9bZOxano5dI2Hnp47mBgKRYdkfojBAzWbf30 AS1h0gI2UBPYiISN1rQZbG/eOx509RBzzKnEH0VCBlJikKPiMqpKrbMuE04BTqSNsaTw GjM1+81OrjsRoOahSXi0NSfCh+LjPe/ygVsjElIHmSFHh9IgjFZ0gkkMQgS8+v1Vv7Zh SpAuv5N1l4UAIrxnIYt67kNsbKtNCEq/yaZf2UJ5SzTgrt9pUnKnOnRj/VqCUGZz0M8D nS6jH6+orNjYNrZpTIxh/f4QYy2gTWNY7WzekUxiiRLEiZHOvdMofthlWqHoohezTZsW L/HA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.6 with SMTP id n6mr145050wix.59.1374609328376; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.119.225 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:55:28 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qzwbu1VIHrqqxwmbgUlXhkqIoyQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: cordova-app-harness and the App Store From: Brian LeRoux To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Word on the legal list is that yes this is possible. Just finding out whom has the keys (or if they even exist yet) for the Apple Developer account for the ASF. Even though we *just* shipped 3 I have to say I'm really excited for this capability for the development flow. =) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Shazron wrote: > +1 for Apache handling it first, if possible. > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> Ya ppl are going to freak out for this functionality. =) >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Michal Mocny wrote: >> > I haven't actually played with this yet. I think this would make an >> > awesome blog post. Found an old note that says "record a video to show >> off >> > the app-harness". I still think thats a good idea. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > >> >> I'll ping the legal list to see what the process is for deploying to >> >> proprietary channels. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Simon MacDonald >> >> wrote: >> >> > I think it makes sense for Apache to own it in the app store. It also >> >> > leaves groups like Adobe, Google, etc. the opportunity to drop their >> >> > own versions of the app-harness with additional proprietary >> >> > functionality. >> >> > >> >> > Simon Mac Donald >> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lorin Beer < >> lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> I agree with your breakdown of options in order of sanity, Braden :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Ideally this should be owned by the organization that owns the code: >> the >> >> >> Apache Cordova Project. While an acceptable second would be for the >> >> Adobe >> >> >> Cordova Team to publish it, I think there is a precedent for an >> Apache >> >> >> project owning and managing an appstore account. >> >> >> >> >> >> Apache OpenOffice is made available through the mac appstore. >> >> >> >> >> >> - Lorin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Braden Shepherdson < >> >> braden@chromium.org>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> So we've got a working app harness in the cordova-app-harness repo. >> >> One of >> >> >>> the founding goals for the app harness was that it could be placed >> >> into the >> >> >>> Play Store and App Store. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Then the question is: who owns the apps in the various markets? It >> >> seems to >> >> >>> me that there are four possibilities: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 1. Apache Cordova project (Can we do that under Apache's rules? >> Apple's >> >> >>> rules? Is there precedent at Apache for App Store accounts and >> such?) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2. Adobe PhoneGap team >> >> >>> 3. Google Cordova/Mobile Chrome Apps team >> >> >>> (4. Some individual person from one of the above, separately from >> the >> >> >>> larger organization.) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> These are in descending order of how sane I think they are. If it's >> >> >>> possible for the Apache project to control the AppStore accounts, >> that >> >> >>> would be best. If not, the PhoneGap team is probably the best way to >> >> go. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thoughts? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Braden >> >> >>> >> >> >>