Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CF231013B for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 02:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41706 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2013 02:48:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 41675 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2013 02:48:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 41667 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2013 02:48:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 02:48:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.47] (HELO mail-oa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.219.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 02:48:36 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m6so3631703oag.20 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:48:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HaQ4OtwkIzoKkLckOAss1Zj+yXcNbozvNazLBxI1UjA=; b=pKeLrnGexatMkTEcn0ftprf93biflwdoNQqpQ2JWVxmfc4YEThF0fFKoGgsjCkO+pD boRQq3ag4g2aUKuF03zW0wa+qqBW31lt6R+4aSvVPBh6qklN3bBUrZ/6sVtK+xPjjETl /TYnX81hVCYASW8kWmmffh2QwQOuIHQUAAkJoO9y5GoM+8ab6p1aDF8RDiVT4EVgi1m8 txWK3/X8BYe+6LuNC+QCxHbzxByA0vtkw5GDkHoc/TGH2WY+f5Fqb9WoO2UFHuhipz+0 aDD/7/T3WlK25MCCmzOpExR5BODxX0tOBoNzsPFqShaKbpawGa8M7ulTXefeff1BMILP r5Fg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.67.3 with SMTP id xs3mr21148257icb.45.1374979695806; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.222.197 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:48:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:48:15 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fU1opHCqddRVrj8CQEU8Y4puHSc Message-ID: Subject: Re: cordova-app-harness and the App Store From: Brian LeRoux To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Quick update: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-174 As the agreements are currently offline we're in a bit of a holding pattern but getting closer! Companies planning downstream versions should be getting this ball rolling w/ their legal entities too. On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Still bumping around in legal. Sorry for the delay everyone. > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Anis KADRI wrote: >> Awesome! Apache is the way to go! >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> >>> Word on the legal list is that yes this is possible. Just finding out >>> whom has the keys (or if they even exist yet) for the Apple Developer >>> account for the ASF. >>> >>> Even though we *just* shipped 3 I have to say I'm really excited for >>> this capability for the development flow. =) >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Shazron wrote: >>> > +1 for Apache handling it first, if possible. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >>> > >>> >> Ya ppl are going to freak out for this functionality. =) >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Michal Mocny >>> wrote: >>> >> > I haven't actually played with this yet. I think this would make an >>> >> > awesome blog post. Found an old note that says "record a video to >>> show >>> >> off >>> >> > the app-harness". I still think thats a good idea. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> I'll ping the legal list to see what the process is for deploying to >>> >> >> proprietary channels. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Simon MacDonald >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > I think it makes sense for Apache to own it in the app store. It >>> also >>> >> >> > leaves groups like Adobe, Google, etc. the opportunity to drop >>> their >>> >> >> > own versions of the app-harness with additional proprietary >>> >> >> > functionality. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Simon Mac Donald >>> >> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lorin Beer < >>> >> lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> I agree with your breakdown of options in order of sanity, Braden >>> :) >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ideally this should be owned by the organization that owns the >>> code: >>> >> the >>> >> >> >> Apache Cordova Project. While an acceptable second would be for >>> the >>> >> >> Adobe >>> >> >> >> Cordova Team to publish it, I think there is a precedent for an >>> >> Apache >>> >> >> >> project owning and managing an appstore account. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Apache OpenOffice is made available through the mac appstore. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> - Lorin >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Braden Shepherdson < >>> >> >> braden@chromium.org>wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> So we've got a working app harness in the cordova-app-harness >>> repo. >>> >> >> One of >>> >> >> >>> the founding goals for the app harness was that it could be >>> placed >>> >> >> into the >>> >> >> >>> Play Store and App Store. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Then the question is: who owns the apps in the various markets? >>> It >>> >> >> seems to >>> >> >> >>> me that there are four possibilities: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> 1. Apache Cordova project (Can we do that under Apache's rules? >>> >> Apple's >>> >> >> >>> rules? Is there precedent at Apache for App Store accounts and >>> >> such?) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> 2. Adobe PhoneGap team >>> >> >> >>> 3. Google Cordova/Mobile Chrome Apps team >>> >> >> >>> (4. Some individual person from one of the above, separately from >>> >> the >>> >> >> >>> larger organization.) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> These are in descending order of how sane I think they are. If >>> it's >>> >> >> >>> possible for the Apache project to control the AppStore accounts, >>> >> that >>> >> >> >>> would be best. If not, the PhoneGap team is probably the best >>> way to >>> >> >> go. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Braden >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>