Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6B5ACAE9 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99571 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2013 17:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 99545 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2013 17:47:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 99527 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2013 17:47:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:47:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.172] (HELO mail-ob0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:46:59 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo10so1135222obc.3 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DR2AYwS8aqVya6BnjM+L43KoCT3CN9oAaK4s5mDbT9I=; b=EHC0efGkJMVrtVmwogFgeXxtxqj4kfJBCFQWuX5jEiFd2ebPlT4mtIBOwXOh+CenzB jVdHr3naBa2SQDKvBfBchczs4tkkyAUip/wzvEUm7Up+1dKQinpuJdZYxfkFvBA8pIgx hbexJqXBWDHtFYmaC2THsUdVkOW9IP37G5COe/pm5fOocFQ1SgPhV6/owgHMRXP0bZGK SHCO9OOt045nrxFGNojJPfkelqAvUg5hHW0MtxKytTkfpU+f70ES8EqwO/Q+kljIIoUy vtnYVo+ALAqSGuRk274fltJwz4be2fVNvRPRvMntqFeoawqRPPPKHHOSm/VT/V1Ngdag R7DA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DR2AYwS8aqVya6BnjM+L43KoCT3CN9oAaK4s5mDbT9I=; b=Fl+y+UaS/t5nZulBTBLwlRoQ4RrFhz+pLntec0QtU7rSmndP8vQa5/uq9pka2K31Ud Rbxky8X8YQbwCMTN5vxGYnEXKreqBCmjU3Rl/N1zhGW7DCVOm2SRcBBk1XBuEXj0OvvU 3DEhE6qzmtazatimnzwrHj8Hxs5QI/diDiHW4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=DR2AYwS8aqVya6BnjM+L43KoCT3CN9oAaK4s5mDbT9I=; b=HD5VErd1LT2ax/KhRzG6Or4z820f5A3YO26Fm9ZsoXR1ro0lwv58f+sjQX0rye7Ult pbTKgJuLaWc7zulzNF0nkGjxv+65ZG4bAXTVTF1Squ3Qytml79Vk7me8GA7CrEd27ae3 RPXzjJKgATCYgCkyh1dcn/SW010L4wPElGTjYu0W0DVeeXivu2lp6Mv0R3rYFLr7PR8q RpYB7utK32KTlcyEzEe0+/g2YLIynoX0e4DzmQHDuGGKKCm8cyaJkH07BULgB/L9/OyA 48jSrWd8pDA6sOVV361t7rEU7gxdzekZDdCMoFr3qObE1KLgLzr6uaRXweyLVCs2tZfB dRTA== X-Received: by 10.182.128.42 with SMTP id nl10mr739876obb.41.1373996798186; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: agrieve@google.com Received: by 10.182.145.101 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Grieve Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:46:18 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wZMfjMH-8qtWjOKPw5frtpCeTEk Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3.0.0 Testing thread To: Andrew Grieve Cc: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1cc9e14341104e1a48ff8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKCcNt0vKnxJBNePuSKDBh88ECwbQPJWhEab0dHhsqQ6ExCbHZKvpYc/KfP/RFfHBE6QbAeHMwVSiKcvzeFKvVh0Oq+K0vH4JHc7tSuOgNMsP/BrIYQ4ilTFj1pfTQY9sZCd2ZLxvyP53Jt1jgTyNeBcXLl7739ivTzMqlMTS2bHrQcc29LaAtl715vgup9bDJBxOR X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff1cc9e14341104e1a48ff8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Okay, seems it was a bad rebase when Ian made the base64 change. Will be fixed shortly. Weird that these would pass at all for anyone in the past week! On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > Okay - on my N4 4.2.2 they are failing as well. I'll look into it. > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> I'm testing on the HTC One running stock 4.2.2. The Google one without >> sense and the other crap. >> On Jul 16, 2013 9:51 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: >> >> > Joe - what setup are you seeing the failures for? I'm running latest >> > everything and on 4.1.1 emulator all file tests pass. >> > >> > Shouldn't be related to ResourceApi change, as the File plugin doesn't >> use >> > it. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Filip Maj wrote: >> > >> > > Yes, when you clone down either of the tools, ALWAYS run `npm >> install` in >> > > its directory to reinitialize the dependencies. Even when just >> updating >> > > the code for the tools, run `npm install` just in case in case the >> deps >> > > changed >> > > >> > > On 7/16/13 8:06 AM, "Shazron" wrote: >> > > >> > > >aha, cordova-cli specified plugman 0.9.3 -- and that works. It's a >> bug >> > > >when >> > > >cordova-cli uses the latest plugman >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:03 AM, David Kemp >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I had the same error that you got, but running npm install in the >> > > >> cordova-cli directory installed a fresh one (not sure which >> version ) >> > > >>and >> > > >> everything worked fine >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Shazron >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > I installed plugman 0.9.6 before using cordova-cli from master, >> and >> > > >>that >> > > >> is >> > > >> > the latest on npm - but I assume you mean the latest from the >> > > >> > cordova-plugman repo >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:42 AM, David Kemp >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > the newest cli needs the newest plugman. >> > > >> > > Also if you uninstall plugins with the older version, the new >> one >> > > >>wont >> > > >> > put >> > > >> > > them in. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Shazron >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > I'm using the master version of the cordova-cli, installing a >> > > >>plugin >> > > >> is >> > > >> > > > fine, but uninstall throws this error: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > $ ../cordova-cli/bin/cordova plugin remove >> > > >> > > org.apache.cordova.core.console >> > > >> > > > [TypeError: Object function uninstallPlugin(platform, >> > project_dir, >> > > >> id, >> > > >> > > > plugins_dir, options, callback) { >> > > >> > > > if (!platform_modules[platform]) { >> > > >> > > > var err = new Error(platform + " not supported."); >> > > >> > > > if (callback) return callback(err); >> > > >> > > > else throw err; >> > > >> > > > } >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > var plugin_dir = path.join(plugins_dir, id); >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > if (!fs.existsSync(plugin_dir)) { >> > > >> > > > var err = new Error('Plugin "' + id + '" not found. >> > > >>Already >> > > >> > > > uninstalled?'); >> > > >> > > > if (callback) return callback(err); >> > > >> > > > else throw err; >> > > >> > > > } >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > var current_stack = new action_stack(); >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > options.is_top_level = true; >> > > >> > > > runUninstall(current_stack, platform, project_dir, >> > plugin_dir, >> > > >> > > > plugins_dir, options, callback); >> > > >> > > > } has no method 'uninstallPlatform'] >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Joe Bowser < >> bowserj@gmail.com> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Has anyone managed to get plugman to uninstall a plugin? >> The >> > > >> > > > > dependencies plugin never cleanly installs or uninstalls. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Shazron < >> shazron@gmail.com> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4264 >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Turns out it was a "false positive" failure, the test >> needs >> > > >>to be >> > > >> > > > > improved. >> > > >> > > > > > But so far all systems go for iOS. >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Shazron < >> shazron@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> So far I went and tested with the plugins (specified in >> the >> > > >> > > > > >> dependencies-plugin on cordova-mobile-spec) on master >> for >> > > >>iOS, >> > > >> > with >> > > >> > > 1 >> > > >> > > > > test >> > > >> > > > > >> failing: >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> File API DirectoryReader interface readEntries >> > file.spec.109 >> > > >> > should >> > > >> > > > > return >> > > >> > > > > >> an empty entry list on the second call. >> > > >> > > > > >> Expected 0 not to be 0. >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > --e89a8ff1cc9e14341104e1a48ff8--