Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E5B610115 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76377 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2013 14:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 76347 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2013 14:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 76339 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2013 14:27:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:27:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lholmqui@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:27:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6CEQgqL011839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:26:43 -0400 Received: from [10.10.55.150] (vpn-55-150.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.55.150]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6CEQesW028466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:26:41 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Wondering what folks think about the default project From: Lucas Holmquist In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:26:39 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <84CEDA87-6194-47DB-833F-C722E6AF78A7@redhat.com> References: To: dev@cordova.apache.org X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 to keeping the default template, but the ability to change it if you = want to On Jul 12, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Shazron wrote: > Carlos I think that is essentially what others have proposed here - = specify > a template to use. >=20 > Personally I like the default project to still be the default, if only = for > the majority of our users who are not more experienced programmers. = More > experienced programmers will not be put off by specifying a template = option > for a blank template, IMO (but for less experienced people, I contend = it is > the reverse). >=20 > While helping users troubleshoot in the Google Groups, or = investigating > bugs in JIRA, I often tell a user to create a new project (thus using = the > default template) and isolate their bug there, so we have a common = base to > verify and test bugs. >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Carlos Santana = wrote: >=20 >> can it be an option to the cordova cli? >> cordova create [--noHelloApp] >> or >> cordova create [--blankIndexHTML] >>=20 >> You get the point >>=20 >> I vote for default to have defaultApp included. >> It provides gratification of every "Hello World" gives when starting = with >> something new. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Michael Jackson = >> wrote: >>=20 >>> I really like the default app. As a brand new cordova dev it helped = me >>> understand how to get started with it. >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Michael Jackson >>> @mjackson >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ray Camden = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I can add this as a Jira item if it makes sense, but, what do folks >> think >>>> about the following: >>>>=20 >>>> I'd like to propose that the 'default' PG app created by the CLI be >>>> changed. Right now it is cool. Looks neat. But is completely >> unnecessary >>>> after you've after learned how to use PG. It's a great example for >> folks >>>> learning PG, but for those of us who know and just want to get = started >>>> quickly, it actually takes me more time to *remove* the HTML, CSS, = and >> JS >>>> used in the default then it does to create a new project. Not to be >> over >>>> dramatic, but it really is the worst part of the process for me. = Then >>>> again, I tend to make quite a few POCs with the CLI so this issue = hits >> me >>>> more often than normal probably. >>>>=20 >>>> I know the CLI is just copying a template (I've blogged on this >> before), >>>> but shouldn't the default be something better for developers? >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Carlos Santana >> >>=20