cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Plugin / Platform mismatch problems
Date Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:06:16 GMT
Agree.
For the last point. There is a <keywords> tag added to the spec to
facilitate search. Has to be added by plugin author.
I am going to drop the current names for the registry and republish
them with the new convention. Unless anyone has any objections. We'll
implement that prefixing right after.

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> I think what would work is:
>
> - use ids to uniquely identify
> - prepending org.apache.cordova.core or w/e our core plugin namespace is
> as a fallback attempt to match makes sense
> - finally, for discovery/searching, we should do searches vs a plugin's
> <description> field and do our best to enforce good descriptions on
> plugins being submitted to the apache cordova registry
>
> On 7/29/13 1:13 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Right but npm registry uses JSON not XML. I think prefixing core
>>plugins when no package name is provided is a good idea.
>>
>>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That could be accomplished with XSLT. And XPath has basic query
>>>capability. James Jong and I have skills in those.
>>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh yeah. Some kind of at-publish-time conversion of certain plugin.xml
>>>> fields to json fields?
>>>>
>>>> On 7/26/13 10:27 AM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think XML is not a query friendly language. I suggest we add an
>>>>> engine field initially and then add fields as we need them. I suspect
>>>>> we won't be needing the bulk of plugin.xml in the registry. I have to
>>>>> experiment with custom fields still but it seems possible. I will
>>>>> report back sometime today.
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message