cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Lewis <lewi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 3.0.0 as a beta release?
Date Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:43:30 GMT
This is why I'm upgrading from 2.5 to 2.9 now.


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> As I'm going through all of the polish details, reading through the upgrade
> guides, and thinking about API-type things that we'd still like to change,
> I'm wondering if it would be wise to message 3.0 as an "early-adopter" or
> "beta" release.
>
> One prime example of something that I think people will get tripped up by
> is that when you use Xcode or Eclipse, your changes will be often blown
> away by "cordova prepare". I think we should explore solutions to this
> (e.g. in Xcode, have the project reference the root www/ and merges/
> instead of the derived one). Another thing we could do is rename www ->
> derived_www/.
>
> The "beta" / "early adopter" label would mean:
> - No 3.0 "final", we can just go with calling "3.1" stable
> - User expectations will be that CLI may have bugs or rough edges (e.g.
> when you remove a platform, any modifications you make will be deleted)
> (e.g. I don't think there's a way to "plugin ls" that shows the @src of
> your plugins - URL+hash+subdir) (e.g. There is no way yet for apps to
> depend on plugins by adding them to your config.xml & typing "cordova
> plugin sync")
>
>
> Usually major releases come with the expectation that they are better &
> more solid & worthy of attention. I feel like 3.0 will be more of an alpha
> in terms of quality / stability of code changing.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message