cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Cordova Blog
Date Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:13:08 GMT
Carlos, what are you looking *for*?

When I go to create a new review request, I see a list of cordova repos,
including "cordova-site".


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hum maybe I'm looking in the wrong place.
>
> I go to Groups and I only see one "cordova"
> https://reviews.apache.org/groups/
> https://reviews.apache.org/groups/cordova/
>
> I got to "My Account" seetings and I can only add one group "cordova"
> Which groups do you belong to or wish to watch?
> [] cordova
>
> Maybe the problem is that folks are not setting the "Group" field to
> "cordova" when they do a new Request?
> Could this be a required field when the repository starts with "cordova*" ?
>
> --Carlos
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > reviews.apache.org is just a place to submit patches for review, manage
> > comments on lines of code etc.
> >
> > Some of us have started using it to organize reviews of patches.  Its not
> > the most beautiful interface, but it serves its purpose.
> >
> > I just tried it and submitting a new review I see many more than three
> > items (heck, cordova itself has like 20 repositories now).
> >
> > We probably should mention it in the workflow, but its not a mandatory
> > item, just a tool for those who are interested.
> >
> > -Michal
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Andrew
> > >
> > > What's the deal with https://reviews.apache.org ? I found it empty
> > (i.e. 3
> > > items)
> > >
> > > Is the Apache Cordova project migrating to it soon?, people don't know
> > > about it?
> > >
> > > If the Cordova Project wants to make it part fo the dev workflow it
> might
> > > help to document it on the Wiki
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow
> > >
> > > I try using it and I failed, if someone can write a short cheat for it
> > that
> > > will be awesome.
> > >
> > > -Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I got the site added to review.apache.org, so in the future we can
> use
> > > > that
> > > > for reviewing changes / new blog posts.
> > > >
> > > > I'll apply your patch tomorrow :).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm good for staging and review new features on GitHub Pages before
> > > > pushing
> > > > > live content to svn/infra
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Did I forgot to say I don't love SVN.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ya.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can we host this on gtihub pages and maintain the website
on
> > > Github,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > let github run jekyll on the source code?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately no. We could use Github for 'staging' I guess.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Downloads and Docs files will still be available from
> > > > > > > http://cordova.apache.org/downloads and
> > > > > http://cordova.apache.org/docsbut
> > > > > > > the website and blog will live in Github.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Again, no. The website needs to be on Apache infra. =/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Santana
> > > > > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Santana
> > > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Santana
> <csantana23@gmail.com>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message