cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Status of the 2.9.x branch?
Date Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:59:30 GMT
There've been enough changes going into 2.9.x for Android & iOS that I
think 2.9.1 is warranted.

I don't see why we shouldn't do a full release (we should upload to /dist)


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> Well, that means 2.9.1 then. I think its ok to push a tag that we can
> point users to but not push an actual ./dist release.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No, plugman remove/install is not supported on windows phone until 3.0.0
> >
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The core plugins weren't installed with plugman, so they would have to
> >> be deleted manually.  Kind of a raw deal here.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > I don't think that affects plugman
> >> >
> >> > On 7/30/13 4:23 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Does plugman remove / install work here? If so, I think that would be
> >> >>preferred way.
> >> >>
> >> >>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> Hey
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Apparently Cordova 2.9.x doesn't build with Android 4.3.  This
is
> >> >>> because of an issue with setPluginsEnabled being deprecated in
> >> >>> InAppBrowser.  Since we agreed to support this release, should
we
> >> >>> release a Cordova 2.9.1 soon to incorporate the fix, or just tell
> >> >>> people to replace InAppBrowser with the plugin version?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thoughts?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Joe
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message