Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D06F6FE1B for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34145 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2013 18:33:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 34118 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2013 18:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 34109 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2013 18:33:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 18:33:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.179] (HELO mail-ie0-f179.google.com) (209.85.223.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 18:33:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so1043009ieb.24 for ; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:32:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aL5MSe/vUy0RFoRVCLdwA8Dwy01tG2uYOC8chZP/usE=; b=rLod3IU9r0kNThAoDAJoN66vCq1iJ6PJKDoHb+N9HaU8x9Okt7xA+4Yjm0ea7Bre/P PUggw98dE6VQ6C+7Wuj77V7MwL9Bx2JVj/Tj++kJaOmaBGq0kDljLnNBMswO/Jgmwd+K X3l+9xw6Kh1P5TrSrLJBRAs1Jp2sJH+ty32ruXeyDsc0FmsIq+SaQTN0G0+F6SXGzgGf yS3MWDlww/sjERTCdooUsm8BI1OzwV2XZ2vvW8y3PbqqArwqHQ4bRagjkAwEgtK4fusx n1FkO7cZDtDxZanfZZwcjuDnIpsVyUFMW9UnRe/Vz5VhdhijPTL2lZ+iDDRNTnuPb6rW N8tA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.56.45 with SMTP id x13mr4359379igp.21.1370111562667; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.124.101 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:32:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:32:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gja4d9LzXSoTpEtR6RnbrzT-CD0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.8.0 From: Brian LeRoux To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org yup, see no reason why not On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Steven Gill wrote: > Looking at coho and the 2.8.0rc1, it is not in the release bundle. > > I believe we should add it to the release bundle and push it to npm. The > readme with the CLI can have instructions for installing with and without > npm. > > Thoughts? > -Steve > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Braden Shepherdson wrote: > >> I'll take a look at the state of CLI for 2.8.x. It should definitely be >> tagged on the release branch, and if that branch is forked off of master it >> should probably be rebased. I'll take a look at its state and adjust >> appropriately. >> >> Is CLI part of the release bundle, or is it pushed to npm instead? >> >> Braden >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Benn Mapes wrote: >> >> > Do IT! nice job. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Gill > > >wrote: >> > >> > > Okay. Got it packaged up. 2.8.0rc1 can be found at >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/. >> > > >> > > I will start another thread about starting the process for 2.8.0. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > -Steve >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Lorin Beer > > > >wrote: >> > > >> > > > awesome, thanks! >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Steven Gill < >> stevengill97@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > Working on it. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Lorin Beer < >> > lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Steve, have you cut the release? >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Shazron >> wrote: >> > > > >> > Updated the cli tag to be on 2.8.x branch >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Shazron >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> >> Not sure who tagged 2.8.0rc1 on master2, but it really should >> > have >> > > > been >> > > > >> >> tagged in the 2.8.x branch. >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-cli.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master2 >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Shazron >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >>> Not sure how to proceed with this, I'm prob not the one to >> ask. >> > > I'd >> > > > say >> > > > >> >>> since the stakeholders are away, probably leave it as is, and >> I >> > > can >> > > > >> tag it >> > > > >> >>> later using coho. >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Benn Mapes < >> > benn.mapes@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>>> For the CLI I just updated master2 branch and tested it on >> > > windows >> > > > + >> > > > >> mac >> > > > >> >>>> and everything but the plugin add/remove works. If it still >> > isn't >> > > > >> tagged >> > > > >> >>>> we >> > > > >> >>>> might as well rebase the 2.8.x branch with master2. (I can do >> > > this >> > > > if >> > > > >> >>>> people are ok with it, otherwise we can just leave it as is.) >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Lorin Beer < >> > > > lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com >> > > > >> >>>> >wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > Anis, if you can test this for us before the end of today, >> > > great. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > Otherwise, +1 for tagging at EOD, allowing Steve to cut the >> > > > release >> > > > >> >>>> > first thing tomorrow. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Shazron < >> shazron@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > > Someone more familiar with CLI should look at this. >> Looking >> > > at >> > > > the >> > > > >> >>>> repo, >> > > > >> >>>> > > the only sig. change was for Windows by Benn, after the >> > last >> > > > time >> > > > >> Fil >> > > > >> >>>> > > checked in code. >> > > > >> >>>> > > According to the repo, running 'npm test' should run the >> > > tests >> > > > >> but I >> > > > >> >>>> get >> > > > >> >>>> > > this error below. Not sure how to proceed... by EOD I say >> > > just >> > > > tag >> > > > >> >>>> it, >> > > > >> >>>> > and >> > > > >> >>>> > > if any issues arise we can fix for 2.8.0 final. >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > ------------------------ >> > > > >> >>>> > >> cordova@2.7.4 test >> > > > /Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli >> > > > >> >>>> > >> ./node_modules/jasmine-node/bin/jasmine-node --color >> > > > >> >>>> spec/cordova-cli >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> /Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/index.js:24 >> > > > >> >>>> > > var minorVersion = >> > process.version.match(/\d\.(\d)\.\d/)[1]; >> > > > >> >>>> > > ^ >> > > > >> >>>> > > TypeError: Cannot read property '1' of null >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Object. >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> (/Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/index.js:24:57) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Module._compile (module.js:456:26) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Module.load (module.js:356:32) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Module.require (module.js:364:17) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at require (module.js:380:17) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Object. >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> (/Users/shaz/Documents/Git/Apache/cordova-cli/node_modules/jasmine-node/lib/jasmine-node/cli.js:1:77) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Module._compile (module.js:456:26) >> > > > >> >>>> > > at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10) >> > > > >> >>>> > > npm ERR! weird error 8 >> > > > >> >>>> > > npm ERR! not ok code 0 >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Steven Gill < >> > > > >> stevengill97@gmail.com >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> I asked Fil. He said he hasn't looked at it recently. He >> > > says >> > > > it >> > > > >> >>>> should >> > > > >> >>>> > >> probably be tested. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> If everything gets tagged, I can look into packaging it >> up >> > > > >> tomorrow >> > > > >> >>>> and >> > > > >> >>>> > >> releasing/announcing on the various channels. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> On May 30, 2013 5:58 PM, "Lorin Beer" < >> > > > lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com> >> > > > >> >>>> wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > this is for RC, and I assumed we would, but I don't >> > think >> > > > it's >> > > > >> an >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > absolute requirement... >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > Joe, can you bug Fil/Michael about the status of CLI >> and >> > > > wether >> > > > >> >>>> they >> > > > >> >>>> > can >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > tag? >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Joe Bowser < >> > > > bowserj@gmail.com >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > This is for RC1, right? Do we need docs to even be >> > > tagged >> > > > to >> > > > >> do >> > > > >> >>>> an >> > > > >> >>>> > RC? >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Lorin Beer < >> > > > >> >>>> > lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> Blocking issues on Mobile Spec have been tested and >> > > > >> resolved. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> Mobile-Spec is now tagged. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> We are just waiting on Docs, and CLI. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Shazron < >> > > > shazron@gmail.com >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> Using coho to tag. D'oh - Andrew already tagged >> iOS, >> > > > doing >> > > > >> OS >> > > > >> >>>> X >> > > > >> >>>> > now >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Shazron < >> > > > >> shazron@gmail.com> >> > > > >> >>>> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> I'm tagging iOS and OS X shortly.... >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Al Harding < >> > > > >> >>>> > >> alharding600@gmail.com >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> I also sent off an email to Steve too to see >> about >> > > > >> helping >> > > > >> >>>> us >> > > > >> >>>> > out. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> Let's do this! >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> Al >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Lorin Beer < >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > I think the delay is mostly due to our team >> > being >> > > > away >> > > > >> at >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > conferences >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> this >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > week. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > components left to tag: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > iOS >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > docs >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > CLI >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Mobile Spec >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > I talked with Shaz on tuesday, there are no >> > > > blockers on >> > > > >> >>>> iOS. >> > > > >> >>>> > He's >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > at >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > fluent today, but I would imagine he could >> > easily >> > > > get >> > > > >> it >> > > > >> >>>> > tagged. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Joe, can you bug Michael and Fil to tag CLI >> and >> > > > docs? I >> > > > >> >>>> can >> > > > >> >>>> > tag >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > mobile >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > spec this afternoon if no one else does. Then >> > > Steve >> > > > can >> > > > >> >>>> cut >> > > > >> >>>> > the >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > release. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > Let's get this done. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > - Lorin >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Joe Bowser < >> > > > >> >>>> > bowserj@gmail.com> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > It doesn't help that I'm at JSConf. I'll >> tag >> > > > >> Android if >> > > > >> >>>> > this >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > helps >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> moves >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > things along. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > On May 30, 2013 1:15 PM, "Braden >> Shepherdson" >> > < >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > braden@chromium.org> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> I think part of the delay here is because >> > > Andrew, >> > > > >> who's >> > > > >> >>>> > been >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > driving >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> a >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> large part of the release process, is at >> the >> > > > >> hospital >> > > > >> >>>> > having a >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > baby >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > today. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> We should survey the different release >> > process >> > > > bugs >> > > > >> >>>> and see >> > > > >> >>>> > >> what >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> still >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> needs to be done. Are any repos left >> > untagged? >> > > If >> > > > >> not, >> > > > >> >>>> > we're >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > probably >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > ready >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> to create the rc1 bundle. If so, we should >> > get >> > > > them >> > > > >> >>>> moving >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > forward. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> Braden >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jesse < >> > > > >> >>>> > >> purplecabbage@gmail.com >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Are we ever going to move past 2.8.0rc1? >> Or >> > > > even >> > > > >> get >> > > > >> >>>> rc1 >> > > > >> >>>> > >> out? >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Our new process does not seem to be >> helping >> > > us, >> > > > >> and >> > > > >> >>>> I am >> > > > >> >>>> > >> very >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > discouraged >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > given that we have a looming major >> release >> > > and >> > > > a >> > > > >> firm >> > > > >> >>>> > date >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > target. >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Can we regroup? refocus? >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Cheers, >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Jesse >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > @purplecabbage >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > risingj.com >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >>>> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > >> > > > >> >>>> > >> >> > > > >> >>>> > >> > > > >> >>>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>