cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: [cordova-cli] ripple instead of serve
Date Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:03:21 GMT
+1

I hacked serve together in a couple of hours, and it is not in active use.
Corporate network environments are generally not open to your phone
connecting directly to a serve running on your laptop or desktop, making
'serve' not very useful.

Braden


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> HI GUYS!
>
> I'm reviving this thread :)
>
> There are a couple of issues filed for both CLI commands `ripple` and
> `serve`. We've spoke in the past about axing `serve` in favor of `ripple`
> (see below in this thread).
>
> My suggestion: remove `serve` altogether in 3.0. There was consensus for
> this before but just wanted to loop back with folks to make sure this
> sounded alright.
>
> Serve seems to be completely abandoned: the tests are currently disabled
> (and not passing), so I am in favor of closing the serve-related issues as
> won't fix and suggesting people employ `cordova ripple` instead.
>
> On 3/23/13 7:15 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> >https://uwaterloo.ca/engineering/events/first-robotics-waterloo-regional
> >
> >I was a score keeper last year (two years ago?) and it was super cool.
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Dan, my brother showed me this (he is mechatronics student at UW).  Is
> >>it
> >> still on tomorrow?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Dan Silivestru
> >><dan.silivestru@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Sorry I'm late to the game, I was judging frisbee throwing, pyramid
> >> > climbing robots all day :-)
> >> >
> >> > https://twitter.com/confusement/status/315162754619162625
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > K lets try to land it in 2.6.0rc1. There is still time Gord!
> >> Blackberry +
> >> > > iOS not tagged yet so we can land some more commits in cordova-cli
> >> > >
> >> > > On 3/22/13 3:02 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Like that plan. Say we proceed and land it in 2.6 to feel out.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >> > > >> I'm fine with removing server. In my mind ripple is just
a serve
> >> > command
> >> > > >> on steroids. At this morning's meeting I believe some of
the
> >> Googlers
> >> > > >> expressed concerns about axing out serve, so perhaps a prudent
> >>first
> >> > > >>step
> >> > > >> would be to add Ripple as an `emulate` command and then we
can
> >>take
> >> > baby
> >> > > >> steps to extract out serve over the coming weeks.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 3/22/13 2:45 PM, "Gord Tanner" <gtanner@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>>Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have
it added
> >>as a
> >> > > >>>seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1]
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we
knew we
> >> needed
> >> > > >>>(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding
the
> >> ability
> >> > to
> >> > > >>>serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support
www/
> >>merged
> >> > with
> >> > > >>>platform/www/).
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate
or
> >>merge
> >> > this
> >> > > >>>in
> >> > > >>>as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime)
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple
> >> > > >>>[2] -
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd
> >> > > >>>if
> >> > > >>>f;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528
> >> > > >>>[3] -
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd
> >> > > >>>if
> >> > > >>>f;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny
> >><mmocny@chromium.org>
> >> > > >>>wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Thats awesome ;)
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner
> >><gtanner@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>wrote:
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> > Yeah Michal,
> >> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>>> > That is the exact use case I had in mind.  When
we were a
> >> startup
> >> > we
> >> > > >>>> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and
ripple for all
> >>our
> >> > > >>>>contract
> >> > > >>>> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we
needed to
> >>compile.
> >> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny
<
> >> > mmocny@chromium.org>
> >> > > >>>> wrote:
> >> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>>> > > Very interesting.  Combined with Bradens
proposal to
> >>support
> >> > > >>>>pointing
> >> > > >>>> to
> >> > > >>>> > a
> >> > > >>>> > > local platform, looks very good.
> >> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>>> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason,
platform support
> >>on
> >> a
> >> > > >>>>given
> >> > > >>>> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone
(sorta) on a linux
> >>box
> >> > > >>>>through
> >> > > >>>> > > Ripple.
> >> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian
LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill
offline use case
> >>vs
> >> > lazy
> >> > > >>>>load
> >> > > >>>> > > > vendoring
> >> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > caching could be a future thing
> >> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > might be a really nice path
> >> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM,
Gord Tanner
> >> > > >>>><gtanner@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>> > wrote:
> >> > > >>>> > > > > +1
> >> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > > With this I would want to add
the ability to add a
> >> platform
> >> > > >>>>to a
> >> > > >>>> > > project
> >> > > >>>> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies.
> >> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > > Emulate would just default to
ripple so is still
> >>usable if
> >> > we
> >> > > >>>>can't
> >> > > >>>> > > > build/deploy
> >> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> >> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian
LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >>>> > > > >
> >> > > >>>> > > > >> I think this bleeds back
into other discussions. It
> >>was
> >> > > >>>>mentioned
> >> > > >>>> in
> >> > > >>>> > > > >> the call earlier. I think
some tacit agreement that
> >> ./serve
> >> > > >>>>goes
> >> > > >>>> > away
> >> > > >>>> > > > >> and Ripple is the default
./emulate command. But lets
> >> > > >>>>discuss.
> >> > > >>>> (Just
> >> > > >>>> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.)
> >> > > >>>> > > >
> >> > > >>>> > >
> >> > > >>>> >
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Dan Silivestru
> >> > +1 (519) 589-3624
> >> >
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message