cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:18:43 GMT
JSON files are not valid Javascript code.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the extension
> have to be .js?
>
> On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I was just going to suggest outputting both.  That works for me.
> >
> >@purplecabbage
> >risingj.com
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> >
> >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both
> >>cordova_plugins.js
> >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while.
> >>
> >> Braden
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson <
> braden@chromium.org
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the file Plugman
> >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to be using
> >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js.
> >> >
> >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about this; the
> >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. It's hard to
> >>make
> >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which version
> >>of
> >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here?
> >> >
> >> > Braden
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS
> >> >>
> >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on Windows
> >> Phone
> >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The workaround that
> >>Jesse
> >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare it to
> >> apache's
> >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag pointing
to
> >> the
> >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR approach
> >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*.
> >> >>
> >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we need to
> >>include
> >> >> this bit of functionality.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thoughts?
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I'm still testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530
> >>that I
> >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll get to
all
> >> the
> >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had changes so
I
> >>can
> >> >> get
> >> >> >that done.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS assigned
to
> >>me. I
> >> >> >>will
> >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple
of the ones
> >> Shaz
> >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562.
> >> >> >> >-James Jong
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> >
> >> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely:
> >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel MuiƱo (Camera / FileTransfer)
(e.g.
> >>cb-3185)
> >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534)
> >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between
Android and
> >>iOS
> >> >> >> >>(Jesse
> >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some
> >> Plugin-behaving-nicely
> >> >> >> >>checks
> >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin
takes spends
> >> more
> >> >> >> >>than
> >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android)
thread.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks,
and so I
> >> >> clearly
> >> >> >> >>won't
> >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that
we can focus
> >> more
> >> >> >>on
> >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our release-foo
some
> >>more,
> >> >> >>and
> >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool
(Steven - I'm
> >> >> >>looking
> >> >> >> >>at
> >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P).
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff!
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz"
> >><jheifetz@blackberry.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA.
Check out
> >>CB-3797,
> >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked
on issues anywhere?
> >>I'd
> >> >> >>like
> >> >> >> >>>>>to
> >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature
you're speaking of.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins"
> >><bryan@bryanhiggins.net>
> >> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving
out the environment
> >>settings
> >> >> >>from
> >> >> >> >>>>>> project
> >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We
should have it tested and
> >> >> >> >>>>>>committed
> >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM,
Ian Clelland
> >> >> >><iclelland@google.com
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working
on this morning that could
> >> be a
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to FileWriter.write(Blob)
that
> >>will
> >> >> >>accept
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>a
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place
of a native Blob object.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406,
and new for 2.9)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to
be fixed, then I can take
> >>care
> >> of
> >> >> >>it
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly
to get it in this morning.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00
AM, Filip Maj
> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today
ya? Any objections? Anyone
> >>still
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> on
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning
to get in for 2.9?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael
Brooks" <
> >> >> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good
to me.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013
at 11:19 AM, Shazron <
> >> shazron@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you
said:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli
and docs issues.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time
for iOS I am going to tackle:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303
(to fix)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451
(to
> >> >> >>investigate,
> >> >> >> >>> no
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567
(there
> >>is a
> >> >> PR
> >> >> >>to
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562
(fix in
> >>the
> >> >> >> issue,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> to
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534
(the
> >> reporter
> >> >> >>has
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report,
to repro, and maybe fix)
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd
issue:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013
at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer <
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in
the wind, Shaz.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing
on iOS that needs to be resolved? I
> >>am
> >> >> >>aware
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which
I can take a look at. Anything else you
> >> want
> >> >> >>in?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13,
2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron
> >> >> >><shazron@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I
could say there was more velocity in the
> >>iOS /
> >> OS
> >> >> >>X
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't
been any with me being away at WWDC this
> >> >> week,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the
wind blows I am but a feather. Will try to
> >>get
> >> >> >>more
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved
by rc2.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun
13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's
tackle this early
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabbage@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Huge +1!
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> >><bowserj@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I know this is pretty soon, but how does a
> >>2.9.0rc1
> >> on
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since this is supposed to be a hardening release
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
why we shouldn't start with the RCs.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Joe
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments)
may contain
> >> >> >>confidential
> >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including
material
> >>protected
> >> by
> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges),
or
> >>constitute
> >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information
by anyone
> >> >> other
> >> >> >> >>>>than
> >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If
you have received
> >>this
> >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately
reply to the sender
> >> and
> >> >> >> >>>>delete
> >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
> >> >> >>distribution,
> >> >> >> >>>>or
> >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended
recipients is
> >> not
> >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message