cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:50:05 GMT
Ha, my next question. I want to know too ...
I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x

My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there
wasn't a json file.  It then attempts the script injection to load a .js
plugins file, instead of just giving up.  This would likely be the case in
iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files.

@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8.
> >
> > I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly.
> >
> > On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I am testing on windows as well.  I think I have a change, give me a few
> > >minutes to verify.
> > >
> > >@purplecabbage
> > >risingj.com
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10.
> > >>
> > >> Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows
> > >> phone *
> > >>
> > >> On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not
> > >>guaranteed,
> > >> >and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between
> > >>the 2
> > >> >methods.
> > >> >
> > >> >Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best
> > >>approach
> > >> >is:
> > >> >1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json
> > >> >2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case
> it
> > >> >continues on to a script injection attempt.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >@purplecabbage
> > >> >risingj.com
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> > >> ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> JSON files are not valid Javascript code.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does
the
> > >> >>extension
> > >> >> > have to be .js?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > >I was just going to suggest outputting both.  That works
for me.
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >@purplecabbage
> > >> >> > >risingj.com
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> > >> >> > ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate
both
> > >> >> > >>cordova_plugins.js
> > >> >> > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while.
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> Braden
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson
<
> > >> >> > braden@chromium.org
> > >> >> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the
name of the
> file
> > >> >> Plugman
> > >> >> > >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be
very careful to
> > >>be
> > >> >> using
> > >> >> > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js.
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers
me about
> > >>this;
> > >> >>the
> > >> >> > >> > change to use a .js file and <script>
tag looks fine. It's
> > >>hard
> > >> >>to
> > >> >> > >>make
> > >> >> > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard
to know which
> > >> >>version
> > >> >> > >>of
> > >> >> > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against.
Any ideas here?
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> > Braden
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json
doesn't work on
> > >> >>Windows
> > >> >> > >> Phone
> > >> >> > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag
thread. The
> workaround
> > >> >>that
> > >> >> > >>Jesse
> > >> >> > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch.
You can compare
> > >>it to
> > >> >> > >> apache's
> > >> >> > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates
a script tag
> > >> >>pointing
> > >> >> to
> > >> >> > >> the
> > >> >> > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing
to it. The XHR
> > >> >> approach
> > >> >> > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before
3.0, I think we
> need
> > >>to
> > >> >> > >>include
> > >> >> > >> >> this bit of functionality.
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts?
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530
> > >> >> > >>that I
> > >> >> > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't
want to rush it, I'll
> > >>get
> > >> >>to
> > >> >> all
> > >> >> > >> the
> > >> >> > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS
X has barely had
> > >>changes
> > >> >>so I
> > >> >> > >>can
> > >> >> > >> >> get
> > >> >> > >> >> >that done.
> > >> >> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> > >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec
and the JS
> > >>assigned
> > >> >>to
> > >> >> > >>me. I
> > >> >> > >> >> >>will
> > >> >> > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless
I hear otherwise.
> > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong"
<wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will
start looking at a couple
> of
> > >>the
> > >> >> ones
> > >> >> > >> Shaz
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >-James Jong
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM,
Andrew Grieve <
> > >> >> agrieve@chromium.org
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to
fix a few more bugs, namely:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel
MuiƱo (Camera / FileTransfer)
> > >>(e.g.
> > >> >> > >>cb-3185)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005,
CB-3530, CB-3534)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll
setting inconsistency between
> > >>Android
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> > >>iOS
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>(Jesse
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> brought this up - no
bug filed for this yet I think)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning on
working on adding some
> > >> >> > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>checks
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g.
log a message if a plugin
> > >>takes
> > >> >> spends
> > >> >> > >> more
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>than
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS)
or WebCore (for Android)
> > >>thread.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't
done anything for over 2 weeks,
> > >>and
> > >> >>so I
> > >> >> > >> >> clearly
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>won't
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> get this all done in
the next few hours :P.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting
the release now so that we
> > >>can
> > >> >> focus
> > >> >> > >> more
> > >> >> > >> >> >>on
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a
chance to practice our
> release-foo
> > >> >>some
> > >> >> > >>more,
> > >> >> > >> >> >>and
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements
to the coho tool
> > >>(Steven
> > >> >>-
> > >> >> I'm
> > >> >> > >> >> >>looking
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>at
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading
a release part :P).
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013
at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj
> > >><fil@adobe.com
> > >> >
> > >> >> > >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff!
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28
AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz"
> > >> >> > >><jheifetz@blackberry.com>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10
work is being tracked in JIRA. Check
> > >>out
> > >> >> > >>CB-3797,
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26
PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff
Bryan, is this being tracked on issues
> > >> >> anywhere?
> > >> >> > >>I'd
> > >> >> > >> >> >>like
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>to
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> refer other
issues (CLI) to this feature you're
> > >> >>speaking
> > >> >> of.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13
10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins"
> > >> >> > >><bryan@bryanhiggins.net>
> > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10,
we're working on moving out the
> > >>environment
> > >> >> > >>settings
> > >> >> > >> >> >>from
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> project
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That
work is pretty much done. We should have it
> > >> >>tested
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> within
the next few hours.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon,
Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland
> > >> >> > >> >> >><iclelland@google.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The
only thing that I'm working on this morning
> > >>that
> > >> >> could
> > >> >> > >> be a
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> for
2.9 is an extension to
> FileWriter.write(Blob)
> > >> >>that
> > >> >> > >>will
> > >> >> > >> >> >>accept
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova
File object in place of a native Blob
> > >>object.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob)
is CB-2406, and new for
> > >>2.9)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> If
we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I
> can
> > >> >>take
> > >> >> > >>care
> > >> >> > >> of
> > >> >> > >> >> >>it
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise,
I'll work quickly to get it in this
> > >> >>morning.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On
Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj
> > >> >> > >><fil@adobe.com>
> > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections?
> > >> >>Anyone
> > >> >> > >>still
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> on
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
something that they are gunning to get in for
> > >>2.9?
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" <
> > >> >> > >> >> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
Monday RC1 sounds good to me.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron <
> > >> >> > >> shazron@gmail.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Looking at iOS 2.9.0:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Definitely as you said:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Then all iOS cli and docs issues.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
If there is time for iOS I am going to
> tackle:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303
> > >>(to
> > >> >> fix)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451
> > >>(to
> > >> >> > >> >> >>investigate,
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> no
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
yet)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567
> > >> >>(there
> > >> >> > >>is a
> > >> >> > >> >> PR
> > >> >> > >> >> >>to
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
investigate)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562(fix
> > >> >> in
> > >> >> > >>the
> > >> >> > >> >> >> issue,
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> to
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
evaluate)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534(the
> > >> >> > >> reporter
> > >> >> > >> >> >>has
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
an
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe
> fix)
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Maybe this Untappd issue:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer
> <
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
be the leaf in the wind, Shaz.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be
> > >> >>resolved?
> > >> >> I
> > >> >> > >>am
> > >> >> > >> >> >>aware
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> of
a
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
in
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything
> > >>else
> > >> >> you
> > >> >> > >> want
> > >> >> > >> >> >>in?
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron
> > >> >> > >> >> >><shazron@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
I wish I could say there was more velocity
> in
> > >> >>the
> > >> >> > >>iOS /
> > >> >> > >> OS
> > >> >> > >> >> >>X
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
but
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
there hasn't been any with me being away at
> > >>WWDC
> > >> >> this
> > >> >> > >> >> week,
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> but
if
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
that's
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
where the wind blows I am but a feather.
> Will
> > >> >>try
> > >> >> to
> > >> >> > >>get
> > >> >> > >> >> >>more
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
resolved by rc2.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
<lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
+1, let's tackle this early
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabbage@gmail.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
meh
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
@purplecabbage
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
risingj.com
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip
> Maj
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <fil@adobe.com>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Huge +1!
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> > >> >> > >><bowserj@gmail.com>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I know this is pretty soon, but how
> does
> > >>a
> > >> >> > >>2.9.0rc1
> > >> >> > >> on
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
sound?
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since this is supposed to be a
> hardening
> > >> >> release
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway,
I
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
don't
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
see
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
why we shouldn't start with the RCs.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts?
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Joe
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >>
> >
> >>>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>--
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission
(including any attachments) may
> > >> >>contain
> > >> >> > >> >> >>confidential
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> information,
privileged material (including
> material
> > >> >> > >>protected
> > >> >> > >> by
> > >> >> > >> >> >>the
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client
or other applicable privileges),
> or
> > >> >> > >>constitute
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> non-public information.
Any use of this information
> > >>by
> > >> >> anyone
> > >> >> > >> >> other
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>than
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have
> > >> >>received
> > >> >> > >>this
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> transmission
in error, please immediately reply to
> > >>the
> > >> >> sender
> > >> >> > >> and
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>delete
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> this information
from your system. Use,
> > >>dissemination,
> > >> >> > >> >> >>distribution,
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>or
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction
of this transmission by unintended
> > >> >>recipients
> > >> >> is
> > >> >> > >> not
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> authorized and
may be unlawful.
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >>
> > >> >> > >> >
> > >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message