cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.9.0rc1 this coming monday??
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:52:53 GMT
Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, the
version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is
correct.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ha, my next question. I want to know too ...
> I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x
>
> My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there
> wasn't a json file.  It then attempts the script injection to load a .js
> plugins file, instead of just giving up.  This would likely be the case in
> iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files.
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8.
> > >
> > > I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly.
> > >
> > > On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >I am testing on windows as well.  I think I have a change, give me a
> few
> > > >minutes to verify.
> > > >
> > > >@purplecabbage
> > > >risingj.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10.
> > > >>
> > > >> Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on
> windows
> > > >> phone *
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not
> > > >>guaranteed,
> > > >> >and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between
> > > >>the 2
> > > >> >methods.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best
> > > >>approach
> > > >> >is:
> > > >> >1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json
> > > >> >2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which
> case
> > it
> > > >> >continues on to a script injection attempt.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >@purplecabbage
> > > >> >risingj.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> > > >> ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> JSON files are not valid Javascript code.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file?
Does the
> > > >> >>extension
> > > >> >> > have to be .js?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >I was just going to suggest outputting both.  That
works for
> me.
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >@purplecabbage
> > > >> >> > >risingj.com
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> > > >> >> > ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate
both
> > > >> >> > >>cordova_plugins.js
> > > >> >> > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while.
> > > >> >> > >>
> > > >> >> > >> Braden
> > > >> >> > >>
> > > >> >> > >>
> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson
<
> > > >> >> > braden@chromium.org
> > > >> >> > >> >wrote:
> > > >> >> > >>
> > > >> >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing
the name of the
> > file
> > > >> >> Plugman
> > > >> >> > >> > generates, and it will mean users need
to be very careful
> to
> > > >>be
> > > >> >> using
> > > >> >> > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js.
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users
bothers me about
> > > >>this;
> > > >> >>the
> > > >> >> > >> > change to use a .js file and <script>
tag looks fine. It's
> > > >>hard
> > > >> >>to
> > > >> >> > >>make
> > > >> >> > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's
hard to know
> which
> > > >> >>version
> > > >> >> > >>of
> > > >> >> > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against.
Any ideas
> here?
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >> > Braden
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag
the JS
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json
doesn't work
> on
> > > >> >>Windows
> > > >> >> > >> Phone
> > > >> >> > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1
tag thread. The
> > workaround
> > > >> >>that
> > > >> >> > >>Jesse
> > > >> >> > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a
branch. You can
> compare
> > > >>it to
> > > >> >> > >> apache's
> > > >> >> > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially
it creates a script tag
> > > >> >>pointing
> > > >> >> to
> > > >> >> > >> the
> > > >> >> > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead
of XHR'ing to it. The
> XHR
> > > >> >> approach
> > > >> >> > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on
WP*.
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before
3.0, I think we
> > need
> > > >>to
> > > >> >> > >>include
> > > >> >> > >> >> this bit of functionality.
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts?
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> [1]
> https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530
> > > >> >> > >>that I
> > > >> >> > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I
don't want to rush it,
> I'll
> > > >>get
> > > >> >>to
> > > >> >> all
> > > >> >> > >> the
> > > >> >> > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon.
OS X has barely had
> > > >>changes
> > > >> >>so I
> > > >> >> > >>can
> > > >> >> > >> >> get
> > > >> >> > >> >> >that done.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM,
Filip Maj <
> fil@adobe.com
> > >
> > > >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues
for mobile-spec and the JS
> > > >>assigned
> > > >> >>to
> > > >> >> > >>me. I
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>will
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning
unless I hear otherwise.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James
Jong" <
> wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and
will start looking at a couple
> > of
> > > >>the
> > > >> >> ones
> > > >> >> > >> Shaz
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 ,
CB-3562.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >-James Jong
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21
PM, Andrew Grieve <
> > > >> >> agrieve@chromium.org
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked
to fix a few more bugs, namely:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by
Abel MuiƱo (Camera / FileTransfer)
> > > >>(e.g.
> > > >> >> > >>cb-3185)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs
(CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll
setting inconsistency between
> > > >>Android
> > > >> >> and
> > > >> >> > >>iOS
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>(Jesse
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> brought this up
- no bug filed for this yet I
> think)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning
on working on adding some
> > > >> >> > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>checks
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> on the native side.
E.g. log a message if a plugin
> > > >>takes
> > > >> >> spends
> > > >> >> > >> more
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>than
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for
iOS) or WebCore (for Android)
> > > >>thread.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't
done anything for over 2
> weeks,
> > > >>and
> > > >> >>so I
> > > >> >> > >> >> clearly
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>won't
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> get this all done
in the next few hours :P.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with
starting the release now so that
> we
> > > >>can
> > > >> >> focus
> > > >> >> > >> more
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>on
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give
us a chance to practice our
> > release-foo
> > > >> >>some
> > > >> >> > >>more,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>and
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more
enhancements to the coho tool
> > > >>(Steven
> > > >> >>-
> > > >> >> I'm
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>looking
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>at
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading
a release part :P).
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17,
2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj
> > > >><fil@adobe.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> > >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff!
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28
AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz"
> > > >> >> > >><jheifetz@blackberry.com>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all
BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA.
> Check
> > > >>out
> > > >> >> > >>CB-3797,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17
1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <fil@adobe.com>
> > > >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good
stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on
> issues
> > > >> >> anywhere?
> > > >> >> > >>I'd
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>like
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>to
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> refer
other issues (CLI) to this feature you're
> > > >> >>speaking
> > > >> >> of.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13
10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins"
> > > >> >> > >><bryan@bryanhiggins.net>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
For BB10, we're working on moving out the
> > > >>environment
> > > >> >> > >>settings
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>from
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
project
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
to HOME.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
That work is pretty much done. We should have
> it
> > > >> >>tested
> > > >> >> and
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
within the next few hours.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland
> > > >> >> > >> >> >><iclelland@google.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
The only thing that I'm working on this
> morning
> > > >>that
> > > >> >> could
> > > >> >> > >> be a
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
candidate
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
for 2.9 is an extension to
> > FileWriter.write(Blob)
> > > >> >>that
> > > >> >> > >>will
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>accept
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
Cordova File object in place of a native Blob
> > > >>object.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
(FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new
> for
> > > >>2.9)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I
> > can
> > > >> >>take
> > > >> >> > >>care
> > > >> >> > >> of
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>it
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
post-rc1.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this
> > > >> >>morning.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj
> > > >> >> > >><fil@adobe.com>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
SO: we're doing this today ya? Any
> objections?
> > > >> >>Anyone
> > > >> >> > >>still
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
on
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
something that they are gunning to get in for
> > > >>2.9?
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" <
> > > >> >> > >> >> michael@michaelbrooks.ca>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
Monday RC1 sounds good to me.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron <
> > > >> >> > >> shazron@gmail.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Looking at iOS 2.9.0:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Definitely as you said:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Then all iOS cli and docs issues.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
If there is time for iOS I am going to
> > tackle:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303
> > > >>(to
> > > >> >> fix)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451
> > > >>(to
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>investigate,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> no
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
fix
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
yet)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567
> > > >> >>(there
> > > >> >> > >>is a
> > > >> >> > >> >> PR
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>to
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
investigate)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562(fix
> > > >> >> in
> > > >> >> > >>the
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> issue,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
to
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
evaluate)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534(the
> > > >> >> > >> reporter
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>has
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
filed
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
an
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe
> > fix)
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Maybe this Untappd issue:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin
> Beer
> > <
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
be the leaf in the wind, Shaz.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be
> > > >> >>resolved?
> > > >> >> I
> > > >> >> > >>am
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>aware
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
of a
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
bug
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
in
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
Camera, which I can take a look at.
> Anything
> > > >>else
> > > >> >> you
> > > >> >> > >> want
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>in?
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron
> > > >> >> > >> >> >><shazron@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
I wish I could say there was more
> velocity
> > in
> > > >> >>the
> > > >> >> > >>iOS /
> > > >> >> > >> OS
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>X
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
repos
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
but
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
there hasn't been any with me being away
> at
> > > >>WWDC
> > > >> >> this
> > > >> >> > >> >> week,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
but if
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
that's
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
where the wind blows I am but a feather.
> > Will
> > > >> >>try
> > > >> >> to
> > > >> >> > >>get
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>more
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
issues
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
resolved by rc2.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin
> Beer
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
<lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
+1, let's tackle this early
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
<purplecabbage@gmail.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
meh
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
@purplecabbage
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
risingj.com
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip
> > Maj
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
<fil@adobe.com>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Huge +1!
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser"
> > > >> >> > >><bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
wrote:
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I know this is pretty soon, but how
> > does
> > > >>a
> > > >> >> > >>2.9.0rc1
> > > >> >> > >> on
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
Monday
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
sound?
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Since this is supposed to be a
> > hardening
> > > >> >> release
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
anyway, I
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
don't
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
see
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
why we shouldn't start with the RCs.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Any thoughts?
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Joe
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>>>>>--
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission
(including any attachments) may
> > > >> >>contain
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>confidential
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> information,
privileged material (including
> > material
> > > >> >> > >>protected
> > > >> >> > >> by
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>the
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client
or other applicable privileges),
> > or
> > > >> >> > >>constitute
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> non-public
information. Any use of this
> information
> > > >>by
> > > >> >> anyone
> > > >> >> > >> >> other
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>than
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have
> > > >> >>received
> > > >> >> > >>this
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> transmission
in error, please immediately reply
> to
> > > >>the
> > > >> >> sender
> > > >> >> > >> and
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>delete
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> this information
from your system. Use,
> > > >>dissemination,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>distribution,
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>or
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction
of this transmission by unintended
> > > >> >>recipients
> > > >> >> is
> > > >> >> > >> not
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> authorized
and may be unlawful.
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >>
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >> > >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message