Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86303F2D6 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33937 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2013 21:12:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 33915 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2013 21:12:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 33898 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2013 21:12:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmarcelk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.179] (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:11:59 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id xn12so7057245obc.24 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wDydg5KBmDADFG0/RCyzNPNogG/Bg2yyC82Ph3JCuCE=; b=gYdkLbrPrx1/zk6FS4eGh/Xy2BQfr4vuBPj3rwPzKrrgSdgjBfYq3N46PFx4+vka5C fM/Bp1I/cN6wOdYJAlINXXskSDDdh6/Oe+Y0Tn7pzy8esk2/+bOihdCt474blwk//PIP SA2GtvSeBzjoDcrMwny3CNf5pLKnR1yeMau2Y4Byea4WvApp5HSJAOtN+dYTShOgbO17 B3o1InUEUguvLiIsyP7zNThWqLxLC27/lywgaxZmeTKGHLsABfCCngacE9eqR2nY3V8z o6Wr96Q/hLJ+r0Vt9qYPBhEWv5hQnbpqVIzVmF4J6AXLPZa4opZCQDAGPybpDXSBfxCK yTCQ== X-Received: by 10.60.65.68 with SMTP id v4mr14517334oes.13.1368479498975; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marcelk-macbook.raleigh.ibm.com ([129.33.49.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm18653684oez.4.2013.05.13.14.11.38 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: Sending BB7 to the farm From: Marcel Kinard In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:11:37 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F4C9227-3626-436E-937E-DB491778C122@gmail.com> References: To: dev@cordova.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yup, that is entirely fair. And it's the same solution suggested to our = friends in Asia that wanted to run on iOS 4.3. So if that is how we address older OS's, then it would seem documenting = which older Cordova supports the older OS's would be needed. Then users = could figure out how far back in history to go to find the Cordova that = does what they need. I'm looking at = http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/2.7.0/guide_getting-started_blackberry_i= ndex.md.html and it says that BB 5.0 and up is supported, including = Playbook. That's not accurate, is it? The Getting Started guides for iOS and Android are nice and clear on = this topic. -- Marcel Kinard On May 13, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Lorin Beer = wrote: > Absolutely Marcel, >=20 > although, the impetus behind dropping BB is not the usage numbers, but = the > lack of interest in future support beyond maintenance. We want our = efforts > to go towards BB10 development. >=20 > My understanding is that older blackberry's are hugely popular devices = in > countries we may not immediately consider, like Nigeria. >=20 > I think the important thing to take away is that users wanting to = develop > apps for older generation BlackBerry devices will still be able to, = just > not with Cordova 3.0 +. >=20 > - Lorin >=20 >=20 > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marcel Kinard = wrote: >=20 >> While I'm as happy as the next person to see old versions go away, = perhaps >> something else should be considered when making these decisions: = country >> usage may not reflect global averages. >>=20 >> For example, I recently was in discussion with some folks in a large = Asia >> country regarding iOS 4.3. Apparently iOS 4.3 is much more widely = used >> there than in North America / Europe, it's not a rounding error. As = it was >> explained to me, it is common for users to not upgrade the OS on = their >> phones there to the latest & greatest, it's part of the user behavior = / >> culture. >>=20 >> So the relavant question I'd ask is how popular is BB7 in someplace = like >> Canada? According to >> http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-CA-monthly-201305-201305-bar the >> total BB usage looks to currently be around 10%. It's unclear what = portion >> is BB6 vs BB7 vs BB10. Are we OK with dropping that population? >>=20 >> Our 5% threshold may be hiding some of the story when we look only at = a >> single global number. >>=20 >> -- Marcel Kinard >>=20 >> On May 9, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>=20 >>> +1 sunsetting BB7 >>>=20 >>> On 5/8/13 8:58 AM, "Don Coleman" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I'd be happy to see BB7 go away. It seems like 3.0 could drop = support, >>>> especially if BlackBerry is concentrating on 10 and not releasing >> webworks >>>> updates. >>>>=20 >>>> I have a client asking for support BB7 along with Android and iOS. = This >>>> probably means that I have a cordova-cli project and a separate BB7 >> build >>>> and keep BB7 on PhoneGap 2.x. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Bryan Higgins >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> It is fair to say that our team is focused solely on BB10. The = WebWorks >>>>> SDK >>>>> for BBOS itself has no future planned releases. >>>>>=20 >>>>> One point I should clear up is the new blackberry10 platform code = we're >>>>> introducing does not cover PlayBook as well. The PlayBook runs >> TabletOS, >>>>> which while built on qnx does not as of yet have binary = compatibility >>>>> with >>>>> BB10. Our CEO has said BB10 for PlayBook is in development, but = there >>>>> have >>>>> been no official announcements regarding a release. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Lorin Beer = >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Don's question regarding a BB7 roadmap yesterday made me realize = that >>>>> we >>>>>> don't have one. Concentrating on BB10/Playbook has caused us = ignore >>>>> BB7. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> A little while ago, BB7 was discussed in terms of sending her off = to >>>>> the >>>>>> farm/attic/(silicon afterlife). The decision was reached that we >>>>> should >>>>>> keep up support. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I believe BlackBerry's stance is that they are not interested in >>>>>> maintaining the BB7 Cordova implementation. Ken, Bryan, jump in = here >>>>> and >>>>>> correct me if I'm wrong. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> There is a lot of work involved in getting BB7 to the 3.0.0 cli = stage, >>>>> and >>>>>> if the plan is to drop support for the platform entirely within = the >>>>> next >>>>> 6 >>>>>> months, I don't see that this work is justified. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Deprecation policy is 3 releases now, which means 3.1.0 is the >>>>> soonest we >>>>>> can drop it. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Given that : >>>>>> - Brett on PhoneGap build has described the BB7 usage statistic = as >>>>> "noise" >>>>>> - no new jira tickets are submitted for BB7 unless it's by our = team >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I propose that we : >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 1. keep BB7 pre-cli maintenance mode regardless of how many = releases >>>>> it >>>>>> sticks around for >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 2. announce BB7 deprecation and drop BB7 before the 3.0.0 release >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> The reasoning for 2 is to not pollute the 3.0 release with legacy = code >>>>>> which is not CLI compliant. I realize that this contravenes our >>>>> deprecation >>>>>> policy, but I think the level of interest in BB7 may let us get = away >>>>> with >>>>>> it. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> - Lorin >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20