cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: Is 2.7.0 released?
Date Wed, 01 May 2013 22:53:47 GMT
ugh, ya, that sort of thing leads to design by committee and voting
blocks. lets not.

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 lazy consensus. Cordova has a consistent release schedule so voting on
> something that is predictable seems overkill.
>
> If you feel you'd like to change the release process to include an
> official vote, Andrew, then we should start a vote on the private list,
> I.e. Vote-to-change-the-process kind of vote.
>
> On 5/1/13 3:37 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
>>Ultimately its up to us how we want to run with it. Far prefer lazy
>>consensus to voting.
>>
>>On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>wrote:
>>> Even in the pre-updated release steps, it explicitly says we need a vote
>>> and refers to this "apache way" doc:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We decided on voting for each release? I thought it was lazy consensus
>>>>(as
>>>> with all decisions we make)?
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/13 1:17 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >I'm not sure I saw the vote thread, nor an announcement release, but
>>>> >issues
>>>> >are being closed that indicate that it has happened.
>>>> >
>>>> >I appreciate everyone's effort in getting it out, but the vote is a
>>>>super
>>>> >important step because it's our last chance to say "is everyone
>>>> >comfortable
>>>> >with this release".
>>>> >
>>>> >I'd like to say that it was clearly documented on the release wiki
>>>>page
>>>> >(which it is)... but the wiki's been down for two days :P.
>>>>
>>>>
>

Mime
View raw message