Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60C7E1020A for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51056 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2013 22:21:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 51030 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2013 22:21:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 51019 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2013 22:21:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mikeywbrooks@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:10 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l13so3259577wie.10 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6jzsVSPd7QMoQzftPd6581RLvWZJH9hXDeZQLtDpOfM=; b=GWjV5pd+oFGhJ+h97ZQEtaaE5VEo/IXjB2wvCjiRwI6j379aBaRphAq4fkNDa9ntt8 ga8kiuRUS8svk7LCgu3dDSkf/rIvjGzRykb+SORI3TSnrpopokQFdl5f/07y9+NPTlk+ XytadVShEtvEDZ5SG3Soe8xIa8GyM6ry77j9B119/8TzyJqOR7gf+xz+SJ+K40HKHWrr Ws6W33HayEXGeegml0OAVMMaqawzYv5p/wu+ldl5NqYcJomzvcVZm5+bFf4OFDVYDich PPdll7lzv+JSYLb80JBM6o7JEFkiN5FPEvh2vs/aAxQZMFDs8YEvRgV3SfCv2BwZafY+ 3lgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.188.141 with SMTP id ga13mr36802342wic.9.1366323650717; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mikeywbrooks@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.89.71 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:20:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:20:50 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NpeXYhctK5bIRcoFQ4y_5GqjO-g Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.7 for Adobe Max? From: Michael Brooks To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Cc: Andrew Grieve , Joe Bowser Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c37f5ad96ec404daaa03aa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c37f5ad96ec404daaa03aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure Andrew. Alternatively, you can update the WIki to references the README.md section. Personally, I like keeping the release instructions with the project source code. I know others have different opinions on that. Michael On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > Michael also pointed out that there are also release time instructions in > cordova-app-hello-world's README.md file. > > I'd like to move these to the wiki as well. > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Andrew Grieve > wrote: > > > Good catch. I did update the version for cordova-js. > > > > Incrementing the version is in the Android release checklist on the wiki, > > but it's not in the list of JIRA sub-tasks. I also failed to update > release > > notes. > > > > I think I actually like it better on the wiki, and maybe we can just > point > > to the wiki from the generate JIRA task? > > I would put "updating JS" and "copying hello world app" under the same > > category. They should be on the wiki and not as JIRA issues. > > > > Sound alright? If so, I'll make the changes. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > >> Remember to increment the versions. I had to re-tag on Android > >> because the version wasn't incremented. Did it get incremented on > >> cordova-js? If not, we'll have to re-tag again. > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Grieve > >> wrote: > >> > Also wanted to remind that we can still re-tag, but should not be > doing > >> any > >> > merges between branches. Cherry-picks only. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andrew Grieve > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Alrighty! > >> >> > >> >> Thanks Joe for creating the JIRA issues! > >> >> > >> >> What I just did: > >> >> - branched & tagged cordova-js. > >> >> - closed all of the sample-app issues after merging it into iOS > showed > >> >> there to be no changes. > >> >> - for Android & iOS: updated the JS, branched & tagged > >> >> - updated the CuttingReleases wiki page (still had the old > master/next > >> >> system on it) > >> >> > >> >> I haven't run mobile spec at all yet (did run the iOS unit tests > >> though). > >> >> > >> >> I'm going to spend some time looking at CB-2698 before doing any > mobile > >> >> spec testing. Feel free to follow the master bug to see what else > needs > >> >> doing: > >> >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3072 > >> >> > >> >> Andrew > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew Grieve < > agrieve@chromium.org > >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> New goal - let's aim for today! > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> I'd like to take a look and at CB-2698, but since this is > iOS-specific > >> >>> (and native-code only), I'll go ahead with creating issues & > >> branching the > >> >>> JS. If CB-2698 gets fixed, we can cherry-pick it. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Giorgio Natili < > >> g.natili@gnstudio.com>wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> +1 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 4/16/13 7:52 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >+1. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >So, how do we feel about starting an RC soon? > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >On 4/16/13 10:19 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >>It would be ideal to see 2.7 ship before the month is out for > sure. > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >>On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Joe Bowser > >> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >>> I think that this would be a good thing. It'd be nice to get a > >> >>>> >>> released lined up for Conf-Month! (Adobe Max, Google IO, > JSConf, > >> >>>> etc). > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Andrew Grieve < > >> agrieve@chromium.org > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> >>> > Wanted to see what people thought of trying to get 2.7 out > the > >> door > >> >>>> >>>in > >> >>>> >>> time > >> >>>> >>> > for Adobe Max. The main motivation I see is to have a version > >> that > >> >>>> >>>will > >> >>>> >>> > work the "future" branch of CLI. 2.6 is missing the > >> >>>> plugin_loader.js > >> >>>> >>>code > >> >>>> >>> > required to load a plugin's JS. > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > > > > --001a11c37f5ad96ec404daaa03aa--