Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOBL_k7KD3g9mDqXVoXcUUnU8HsJz4Vu9a5E4XfNXAUFajZmyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABiQX1WSM5TUnk4rev=e6hB_van=UR7n4R8Ns1KwioZ+jOyvcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOBL_k7KD3g9mDqXVoXcUUnU8HsJz4Vu9a5E4XfNXAUFajZmyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:21:15 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOBL_k49haKGnXnV-Pwz8k_+GFBcMPChHz1Fx6RnAifs6-Hzog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RC version numbers
From: Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

OK, even though it won't go into 2.7.0rc1, I added the correct version
anyway.  I do think we need to cut an RC2 before we do a final
release, and I'll start up a separate thread for that.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's an accident! The VERSION files should be 2.7.0rc1
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>> For the JS, we set VERSION = 2.7.0rc1
>> For Android's Device.java, we set VERSION = 2.7.0   (no rc1).
>>
>> Perhaps not a huge deal, but I just want to get clear on this before
>> automating the instructions on the wiki via scripts.
>>
>> Probably from now on we should put the "rc1" on all release candidates, yes?