Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of purplecabbage@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADVgkyOd-wbOMDbsdyLvvb+UhcTcnPSPBHNoSR5jBY0e+dRjpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOBL_k7K9DdRoUT9fEWwk3mzRB-Xm8LeeNQ_2Quw92NDjG5xjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CD9EB578.1D9FD%fil@adobe.com>
	<CAOBL_k7sMK58ThbLQgWEf+BBjumzkiayfGB8mODUbSxV2ycQew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOBL_k63jt1fR4wda_h5auQ+P9MVea=UbCxdH+sCbG6Rza2j6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAASJe7_gd35hVmc_V0Ay-UTP0ewJWpNocPMugWD0GFzVOavgzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKP6k2uEhuFfrrEmExyMWvfu_rrk6PTSo0oqmNXA-V+FhbPKcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOBL_k6f7-aCg-pxPu6StAwWptnfvzemN27u=yJEccWFTH-84Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyOd-wbOMDbsdyLvvb+UhcTcnPSPBHNoSR5jBY0e+dRjpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:23:47 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKP6k2tYTmjGtzMXeE=kfnJb0mGm7bfGrJXbq1bd74HQmxe+gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RC2
From: Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b672666b78f3c04db3608fc

--047d7b672666b78f3c04db3608fc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yeah, let's.

@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> YES
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should we fire up the script and create the tickets for tagging today?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> How about we let it sit, and plan for 2.7.0 release on Monday?
> >>
> >> @purplecabbage
> >> risingj.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Actually, let's just do a release.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > > Android versioning wasn't done right.  In fact, none of the
> versioning
> >>> > > was done right, and I kind of feel that we rushed the release a
> bit.
> >>> > > That being said, I'm not totally opposed to us just doing a 2.7.0
> >>> > > release assuming that we can actually write the correct version
> number
> >>> > > in the correct fields.  (And yes, I'm also at fault for doing
> this).
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> What broke?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On 4/25/13 10:22 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>>Hey
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>The RC1 release was kind of done too fast, and the versioning
> broke.
> >>> > >>>Because of this, I think we should really have an RC2 release
> before
> >>> > >>>we do a 2.7.0 final release.  Perhaps we should start an RC2
> today for
> >>> > >>>this?
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>Thoughts?
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>Joe
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
>

--047d7b672666b78f3c04db3608fc--