Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B79F0BF for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30970 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2013 15:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 30942 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2013 15:59:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 30932 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2013 15:59:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:59:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.49] (HELO mail-bk0-f49.google.com) (209.85.214.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:59:31 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w5so127497bku.36 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=s+Oj+FzhhVylzg+WCfC6KsZrrokl0psdH6bbCIobf74=; b=g3FMXjaNal/NRj2nyPmRmVIY+FNqiSqR9Ct9jSJQNZPjdRvs68KC5/32QIxDfD5B0L /eufbDIu2CdgYi7dZ3fMjD5dXythD4jzq3Du/o/R2MwozpV47w7N2f66YAWz2ucMvMUJ OpM3Pcm+nVe51G92Hv0pf1HacwvFBt44LqMVRpL0n/6Fnt8pvmjRtn+jP1VLkUyIDXyK 4RsotUNCr7pphUwRZWA5aJNLt1L1bsm7NXUx81lC1dInEmvQpQX/G8Y1PcNEJ/bJ0Qqa xX2LbsgMB58WuTi4UOoFOyCsEAC5OyScxI+QYwxCMrMJoOxYDlcel2aDaNV0L0lKAcgk hHlA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=s+Oj+FzhhVylzg+WCfC6KsZrrokl0psdH6bbCIobf74=; b=finWJ5Vl06h0i4i7Q3gETS9xAF1YKHdEvikqDhKlYBYxx8FUlHo0TEkwTnwNBkXwmD +F43dXGdHtOdJxaBKN0VtQN1+CePoN16BRYoaX2t8sPxR6f95CJY6UTPXmBbh+uSspGv OId3MOk2CiFUO9N2il3ZCcRdY2KLAMLjDs48s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=s+Oj+FzhhVylzg+WCfC6KsZrrokl0psdH6bbCIobf74=; b=RjQE+38kOt6OotwyQ05mnSOBaOgR/gh6Yg1k7Kt2cmzMXHFZas2/vz2o2uB5rqLaGi lD9DIaSlkftTc8AQ0f5YFcUUfcefcMgF0ZCnPihu9s5gYny1RpAHx8QXAK5sp1msFCb3 O5iMogSEvz445Lxi+aT3o4A75X31Yb5nCy1I44rn2tJWbCbYeM5kSHQE5+LJuwkoCV7k MfjeZfd0HsjieZSvBhD3hyBHKXySJdd2gCiVC/RMqlB1xQkarAJnuToHV5xEsHY4X/xm heBano1mY2og7KmnQMR4aYkpaHBY98qU3tD4jobilyZv3TkYV25pqFvjNNgoCF9vnVio FauQ== X-Received: by 10.204.246.194 with SMTP id lz2mr8228022bkb.98.1366559951505; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:59:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mmocny@google.com Received: by 10.204.234.71 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:58:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michal Mocny Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:58:51 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Mjt716ekRrx7oELnWWHR3XMvJR8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re-tag Cordova Js? To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041c447a799dae04dae108e0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlu+q4m6KF697fYfb7k/f4eJFZxYDcknjFhFseozNj1BERat0HhKDXkCX8kJwAJXjCcaBanALjMRdN/Y9ZXHajnbQWx/+wbaQJfz0W4JbiRqR+QYuGg/7AyMPW35CauudCn12tU05/ChChl1NmRVkaqVPTvKFkNOFmD3o6udoMx2Q8cGnwFOunmCPqF0C9Qy0rnvo5E X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d041c447a799dae04dae108e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I thought we decided to leave the VERSION in master branch as a constant EDGE or something like that? On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Jesse wrote: > continuous instigation? > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > I've re-tagged Android with the new JS. > > > > WORST RELEASE PROCESS EVER! > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse wrote: > > > Okay, so are we good with 360bd3e65c33ce4f01e2efb82d641a565ef3c333 ? > > > I have tagged WP7+8 > > > > > > @purplecabbage > > > risingj.com > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > > > >> Getting merge conflicts! Seriously, WTF? > > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tim Kim wrote: > > >> > Oh turns out I just didn't push up the 2.7.x changes :) > > >> > > > >> > Thought something crazier was going on. OK - I think it should be > good > > >> now! > > >> > > > >> > *crosses fingers* > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 19 April 2013 17:37, Tim Kim wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Ya...I just realised. Arghhhh. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On 19 April 2013 17:35, Jesse wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> rc1 tag is on master but not the 2.7.x branch > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> @purplecabbage > > >> >>> risingj.com > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Shazron > wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Hey it's no so bad, just find the chevrons and pick the right > > >> section. > > >> >>> If > > >> >>> > you gtg I can take care of it > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Jesse > > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Hurry! It's Friday. > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > @purplecabbage > > >> >>> > > risingj.com > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Tim Kim > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > NOOOOOOO > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > On 19 April 2013 17:15, Shazron wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > You checked in merge conflicts. e.g. > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > +<<<<<<< HEAD > > >> >>> > > > > 2.5.0 > > >> >>> > > > > +======= > > >> >>> > > > > +2.7.0rc1 > > >> >>> > > > > +>>>>>>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Tim Kim < > > timkim85@gmail.com> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Ok, it should be good to go now. > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > On 19 April 2013 16:59, Shazron > > wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Can you commit them to the two branches from your > > local? If > > >> >>> not > > >> >>> > > when > > >> >>> > > > we > > >> >>> > > > > > > generate the js off the branches it's not correct > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Tim Kim < > > >> timkim85@gmail.com> > > >> >>> > > wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Ya I couldn't find them either. My guess is that the > > "Set > > >> >>> > VERSION > > >> >>> > > > to > > >> >>> > > > > > > 2.7.0" > > >> >>> > > > > > > > commit was in a detached head state when pushed to > the > > >> >>> repo. I > > >> >>> > > > wasn't > > >> >>> > > > > > too > > >> >>> > > > > > > > sure what was going on, so I decided to go with the > > flow. > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > On 19 April 2013 16:46, Shazron > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Looking at cordova-js: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=summary > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > The 2.7.0rc1 tag, the last two commits: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/2.7.0rc1 > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > 1. Fixed version number > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > 2. Set VERSION to 2.7.0 > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > I can't seem to find these commits in any branch, > > not > > >> >>> 2.7.x, > > >> >>> > > nor > > >> >>> > > > > > > master. > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Am I going crazy or is there something else going > > on? > > >> :/ > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Tim Kim < > > >> >>> timkim85@gmail.com > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Done and done. > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > On 19 April 2013 14:21, Filip Maj < > fil@adobe.com> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Probably a retag since we use the contents of > > >> VERSION > > >> >>> to > > >> >>> > > > > > > interpolate > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > the > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > framework version string into the JS-only > > >> platforms' > > >> >>> JS. > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > On 4/19/13 2:16 PM, "Tim Kim" < > > timkim85@gmail.com> > > >> >>> > wrote: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Hey gang, > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >I noticed that the 2.7.0rc1 tag commit for > > >> Cordova JS > > >> >>> > sets > > >> >>> > > > the > > >> >>> > > > > > > > version > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > to > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >just 2.7.0: > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=d0ffb8 > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >52378ff018bac2f3b12c38098a19b8ce00 > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Small thing really - should we just force a > > retag > > >> or > > >> >>> do > > >> >>> > > > > > something > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > else? > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Timothy Kim > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > -- > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Timothy Kim > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > -- > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Timothy Kim > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > -- > > >> >>> > > > > > Timothy Kim > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > -- > > >> >>> > > > Timothy Kim > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Timothy Kim > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Timothy Kim > > >> > > > --f46d041c447a799dae04dae108e0--