Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AC71F6FE for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41071 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2013 16:04:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 41036 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2013 16:04:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 41026 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2013 16:04:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:04:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.50] (HELO mail-oa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.219.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:04:42 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j6so4138929oag.37 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:04:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=EvjEvLgR14m/f2/aqeJw6gUoJh0gwM2YTFeIjYKSFJw=; b=im/t38U92sS+p989porxnm9Hmj8YcG+w+JRvxQF7KsG4fH5OIdXgvCZOMViSFOwkK6 hJ3Lojzmh5mdY4cB4vBqdrkZj1Tx92HjV2WomkFXXS6qCxjYTIH6r/WFOKtuzl2h4dFG mdLaF1HvFDl7ZZFcEJfylHGzDz+MwmsosdTXI4D/y3ECpNrTGouRuMcE0ro0cNRV8ENX /wJ3grJUf6e3O6f/CazieklqvUwcNs+SyER8vB3XJ+cWEsxFs1+EYfF3cMkJa5jOY6wp c+gFIL9jntoh4WZXx0Jcmw7uhRtGJNncPIEmsPxEj3ndK/Q7Chs32WLDPtdCiKmpYIoY YL3Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=EvjEvLgR14m/f2/aqeJw6gUoJh0gwM2YTFeIjYKSFJw=; b=IjkcDkZqYoIiFuXAGPgjzMgws38LoMPalnCucZ9zz09j4t/DKUP00iMI+rhG340wy5 oqLFJHz7zukzpIesTzQLUVHx+87tSr2REy1asToV5ECxGrW2PNXm3ivpOY04TTVfDB+r HRKp/IHalfP5UyG1p0cNqMzg8ge6eftyHJT0U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=EvjEvLgR14m/f2/aqeJw6gUoJh0gwM2YTFeIjYKSFJw=; b=SRc3s/Jp34oMkLtYkaQhSTB6bXcbT3dT+96yRFFv+S5kwgCBtXRmfKzPRiFjRDUKgm kbaxMIrdA6OcUKkp/GKU5sXsBv9FSbWFlZHiAOs3ANOCR6QHfkUbJpicS19/M/dvc7nB ZoqbL4KtLWMCvNqF+AR6AkiFyJMAG31Uzc8MHqF9ZNQpgAoHbK5YlimTKKh+XVNHDxdg UnbbKLF9/I7OFwYm0x0qdCxOqacXEUhXWjlaJ5m60qxTu0dMqlxnzTYziVxIX2s6a7Hh cICd5VhkGzgi/ePPUTRMqvClj3j+/2N7RMaQl2GMT+inGewacgbjfSm/Xot3wcs1qlQH S0HQ== X-Received: by 10.182.129.36 with SMTP id nt4mr9035922obb.62.1366992261230; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:04:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: agrieve@google.com Received: by 10.182.18.36 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:04:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <459B787C-BE89-492C-A109-1CC1D632B26F@gmail.com> From: Andrew Grieve Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:04:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WVMqw9IFZ1frsU-IBqGg8lk90mk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Android] The Deprecation of Froyo To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1fff6244f1c04db45b04a X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlo3w/WTJchoP03ePArzIoc7QdbA8IiPysG5Z5cs6sJpmD6WR9xoEpdHiLD3IEVEo5m4fHij8DoEwEWK5tIdFkaPRFxts8QEUc5NpNN67Ay2l/pZNvbD/eylwuvuejxwxR7dReP7KNHnEnCBn+jEhgtVH4KpbedxvKTszcS5XTKdeFA0WCYio1aAn2uTH9kaBBIernV X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1fff6244f1c04db45b04a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe - did you take any action here? JIRA issue? changing of min version? Does this mean we can remove apache commons jar? On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > Late to the party but... > > +1 for dropping support for 2.2 > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:53 AM, James Jong wrote: > > Deprecation in 2.7? > > > > -James Jong > > > > On Apr 15, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > >> Looks like we have consensus > >> > >> Joe is going to be happy :) > >> > >> On 4/15/13 10:24 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: > >> > >>> +1 DROP! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Shazron wrote: > >>> > >>>> My Nexus One latest upgradeable OS is 2.3.6 > >>>> > >>>> +1 for dropping fwiw > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Lorin Beer >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for dropping > >>>>> > >>>>> Steve found a Nexus One in his filing cabinet last week, wonder wha= t > >>>> that > >>>>> was running ... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hahahah... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It was on "Catch of the Day" (an Australian daily deals type site)= . > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ideos X1 - Android 2.2 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 11/04/2013, at 7:43 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Was this on Craigslist? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, tommy-carlos Williams > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> I saw a 2.2 device for sale the other day. I had a sad. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for dropping it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 11/04/2013, at 6:11, Lucas Holmquist > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On our AeroGear project, the lowest thing we support on android > >>>> is > >>>>>> 2.3, so +1 for removing > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Lets give this a few days to make sure we're not about hurt > >>>> anyone. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> (I'm in favor of removing support.) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Michael Wolf < > >>>>>> Michael.Wolf@cynergy.com>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Fwiw I wasn't saying 2.3, but 2.2. The consideration of > >>>> supporting > >>>>>> 2.3 > >>>>>>>>>>> goes based on who your consumer base is, and if 2.3 is worth > >>>> it > >>>>> (had > >>>>>>>>>>> several customers recently where this is a serious > >>>> discussion). > >>>>>> Anywho=C5=A0 > >>>>>>>>>>> loosing 2.2 I don't think would hurt the community greatly. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> mw > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/13 2:54 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who thinks we don't need 2.3 support needs to look at > >>>> what > >>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>> was considering purchasing for my US phone when on road > >>>> trips to > >>>>>> weird > >>>>>>>>>>>> places like Idaho: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/prepay/getPhoneDetail.do?item=3Dprepay= It > >>>> e > >>>>>>>>>>>> m&selectedPhoneId=3D6093&selectedPlanCatId=3D4997 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Michael Wolf < > >>>>>> Michael.Wolf@cynergy.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally we are pushing clients to not touch anything lowe= r > >>>> than > >>>>>> 2.3 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (And > >>>>>>>>>>>>> having serious discussions about their need for 2.3 > >>>> support). > >>>> So > >>>>>> from a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova users perspective this wouldn't bother me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mw > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/13 2:10 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Android 2.2 is a pain point because we only have one > >>>> device in > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vancouver office that is on that version of Android (LG > >>>> Optimus > >>>>>> 3D). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure that other places have more of them, but they are > >>>>>> becoming > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> increasingly rare, and I'd rather us only have to test 2.3 > >>>> and > >>>>>> higher > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when we prepare for a release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Braden Shepherdson > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a picture of what this would gain us? What are > >>>> the > >>>>>> pain > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in terms of bugs or missing APIs between 2.2 and 2.3? I > >>>> have > >>>>> the > >>>>>> vague > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impression that there are several things, but I actually > >>>> don't > >>>>>> know. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are advantages, I'm all for it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Braden > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joe Bowser < > >>>> bowserj@gmail.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good news everyone! Android 2.2 (Froyo) has dipped below > >>>> 5%. > >>>>>> This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means that we can safely drop support for this version o= f > >>>>>> Android and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set our lower bound to Android 2.3. The cool thing abou= t > >>>> this > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will only support devices that you can actually buy > >>>> in a > >>>>>> store at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point, which I think is something that we should ai= m > >>>>>> towards. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Honestly, if Key Lime Pie figured out a way to get 4.x > >>>>>> functionality > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on single-core devices, that'd be awesome, but I highly > >>>> doubt > >>>>>> it. :( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, what do people think about getting rid of Froyo > >>>> support? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > > > --e89a8fb1fff6244f1c04db45b04a--