Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 036531045D for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28232 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 13:11:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 28160 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 13:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 28091 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 13:11:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.173] (HELO mail-ia0-f173.google.com) (209.85.210.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:11:06 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f173.google.com with SMTP id h37so2227464iak.32 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BQpnyWZl7h+Ohhxq3Isl7hv61C9nRylSxTPlv9HGT2Y=; b=BliwiHXrbuLpsZ4F06K+R9EcR6LBZFUqrHWg90y8GkDljcMAitWgSGGRFgsiiq3tom IrIB0rtS9MABLTJey4bRxWRAuWAwVsS6735oqviFxDWmeNfiRnOmPECrpiKci/dAIRnz k7J/fcVfv6hpM2c7ZbrWQ4ZXRCLQnCQt6YayEch4IMSiQFODlvabMRt0+je1lmACVZUL zV+48Kcb5tCfi0Z2VaKhbLUAHUR4PD1ogX+2+8C7jkjJGBwHrKJ83yoZeW45/4qGFs4H zeTIdVpbes0vlQabMGK/e+7wS22lzA+vz1RSZe01bnNfdQb40GLVF6IU2fE5tNWEok9D oYkA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.62.66 with SMTP id w2mr539262igr.81.1365081045470; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.8.167 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:10:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: BB10 and JIRA Etiquette From: Lorin Beer To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc0f0ece287104d988b2d7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bdc0f0ece287104d988b2d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've started cataloguing the failing tests and missing functionality on BB10. There's about 50 failing tests, and many more missing features (minor and major). What I'm wondering is this: 1. dump all the issues in jira as I find them or 2. report the issues as I get an opportunity to fix them given the number of failing tests and issues, it would be some months before I could get around to fixing all of them. On one hand, we get these issues documented so users see were aware of it, and can indicate what they need fixed, not to mention encouraging others to take on some of these issues. On the other hand, it'll bloat our issue count. :) Wondering what the best approach is. - Lorin --047d7bdc0f0ece287104d988b2d7--