cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Clelland <>
Subject Re: [Android] Including okHttp as source might not be such a good idea
Date Tue, 30 Apr 2013 02:53:28 GMT
Lets not try to force all developers to change their settings; that sounds
like a world of pain.

It should work as a jar -- I can't see any compelling reason to have the
source available in eclipse, except for debugging. If there are bugs in
that code, I would definitely prefer to be fixing them upstream, though,
rather than having our own fork.

Can we distribute the jar with cordova-android, rather than fetching it at
install time like with commons-codec? I'm fairly certain that the Apache
license allows that. Also, I don't think that OkHttp has tagged releases
like codec, and I think I would rather ship with tested versions rather
than pointing new users at whatever HEAD happens to be at at any given day.

If that's okay, I'll package it up, and replace the source with the jar on

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Joe Bowser <> wrote:

> Hey
> I'm currently working with Master and I'm noticing that Eclipse really
> hates all these @Override Annotations put in the code.  Since
> everyone's Eclipse will probably work slightly different in this
> regard, and I have no idea how fix this other than by deleting all the
> annotations, I propose that we use a jar for okHttp instead of the
> source, similar to how we use commons-codec.
> Alternatively, if we can figure out how to all agree on the same
> Eclipse settings for Java dev, perhaps that may help as well.  As of
> right now, I can't build master due to these stupid annotation errors.
> Joe

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message