cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Naming: cordova-2.8.0.js --> cordova.js
Date Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:20:13 GMT
Great! I'll make it happen :)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3307


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having
> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
> > in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did"
> > aka jQuery.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" <tommy@devgeeks.org> wrote:
> >
> >>+1
> >>
> >>Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too?
> >>
> >>On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a
> >>> decisive answer here yet...
> >>>
> >>> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js"
> >>> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step to
> >>>add in
> >>> the version number.
> >>> CLI normalizes to "cordova.js"
> >>>
> >>> The version number is now stamped at the top of the file in a code
> >>>comment,
> >>> and I feel that having it in the file name just makes work for us and
> >>>our
> >>> users. I'd like to change all repos to just use "cordova.js".
> >>>
> >>> Any objections?
> >>>
> >>> Andrew
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message