Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C2E6E612 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90199 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2013 17:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 90153 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2013 17:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 90138 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2013 17:10:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:10:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anis.kadri@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.54] (HELO mail-wg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:10:09 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fm10so4265566wgb.33 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:09:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qCfMq09DOX4vY7gEj9/2rUejClSKXfc95YSOVpIzRt4=; b=PmYau6XxDgW9bRYH6v8EfInv+XVw/NZ9RVdX+DD51Fm+S4sKM537HNf2gsd15bMGiz 9j2x+3Ss0NgsIbs+4HRmyujjgzTHw0W8LVapTO+nzedn/lhHG8gM0Oi0QWaoTFV84JMG kHOqLoZb0bUW2iEzgHk0Xr/R78SGZ+RMnPQRniWtQ7sGH/4vyOBXFhiIFRUiWtxJdxgT ZlMH4lzh0rMAny5HPtHd6+QJDsCMb4RmhbP/qJVateoFYjzgeYcf/oLeASNOlWi2YH2T 51GF/MUH7Hy2vKeBEibrJy8++6feyLxUsoIflJhPRqTeOVQjpAPeCjfMVekjUeAOvYBv 4fug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.10.202 with SMTP id k10mr20269631wjb.53.1363540188549; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.168.229 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:09:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: archiving older platforms From: Anis KADRI To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d9b8d9358e804d821f05d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d9b8d9358e804d821f05d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 According to [1]: "Projects whose PMC are unable to muster 3 votes for a release, who have no active committers or are unable to fulfill their reporting duties to the board are all good candidates for the Attic." I believe those projects satisfy the "no active committers" argument. I don't see any active committers for Bada, Qt or WebOS. Markus Leutwyler is the only WebOS committer and is no longer employed by the company that is in charge of it and I am not sure if he's still interested in maintaining it. There are still devices out there I am sure but no new devices are getting shipped. Bada is officially dead [2] but they still released an SDK a couple of weeks ago [3] O_O! They still owned #4 spot in Q3 2012 ahead of Windows Phone [4] As far as bb 6 and 7, I am sure the majority of devices out there are BB 6 and 7. BB10 just came out so there can't be that many yet. Developers don't seem to be interested in those platform though and I think the focus should be on BB10. [1] http://attic.apache.org/ [2] http://www.fiercemobilecontent.com/story/samsung-scraps-bada-os-folds-it-tizen/2013-02-25 [3] http://static.bada.com/releasenotes/2.0.6.html [4] http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2237315 On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > The question has come up about our continued support for: > > - bada > - webos > - qt > - bb6 & bb7 > > Nobody is currently actively maintaining Bada, and Qt. However, I > could see us wanting to keep Qt around given Ubuntu Phone. There are > no new webOS devices, though rumours persist they could happen, it > seems like its more of a ceremony than real support. The older BB > platforms are maintained but the real focus is BB10. > > Thoughts? > --047d7b5d9b8d9358e804d821f05d--