cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:29:56 GMT
Since we haven't released anything yet, can we simply retag the rc1 and
push a new commit to the 2.6.x branches out there?

On 3/27/13 11:25 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

>Windows platforms cannot load the JS generated by cordova-js.
>The deviceready event does not fire because of an exception fired in the
>XHR loading code added by Braden here [1]
>
>If I wrap the XHR plugin loading code :
>
>    try {
>        // Try to XHR the cordova_plugins.json file asynchronously.
>   ...
>
>   }
>   catch(err)
>{
>  finishPluginLoading();
>}
>
>Then all is good.
>Do we re-tag, move on to rc2, or should I just patch WP7+WP8 ?
>
>Cheers,
>  Jesse
>
>
>
>
>
>[1]
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=f97bd6
>94da3364664776d79c5bbf5e914e8e4f5a
>
>
>
>@purplecabbage
>risingj.com
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> It's under cordova-labs' jira branch.
>>
>> Start at line 151 of jira.js [1]. Increment the num_callbacks var. Check
>> out the flow a little bit to get an idea of what you need to do. Then
>> copy/paste to add the new subtasks.
>>
>> Cathc me on gtalk if you have more qs.
>>
>> [1]
>> 
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-labs.git;a=blob;f=jira.
>>js
>> ;h=18a76980566e6972203b92ade12bb21f3a9d79a8;hb=refs/heads/jira#l151
>>
>> On 3/22/13 11:35 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Fil,
>> >Since cordova-osx is functional now -- how do I add JIRA tasks to the
>> >script (not sure where it is exactly) you used to add subtasks for a
>> >release? I want to add "Update www/ application for OS X" and "Update
>> >JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and
>>the
>> >> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release
>>mode!
>> >>
>> >> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
>> >> >
>> >> >-James Jong
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also
>>cherry-pick
>> >> >> regressions back to more than just the current release.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong
>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches for
each
>> >>major
>> >> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release candidates
>> >>and
>> >> >>>minor
>> >> >>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x, ...
>> >>branches?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> -James Jong
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson
>> >><braden@chromium.org>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's
the
>> >> >>>>(high-level)
>> >> >>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch. We're
not
>>using
>> >>them
>> >> >>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
>> >> >>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
>> >> >>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new branch
>>2.6.x)
>> >> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
>> >> >>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x) not
the
>>point
>> >> >>> release
>> >> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1, 2.6.0rc2,
>>etc.
>> >>and
>> >> >>> then
>> >> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x branch
as
>>well,
>> >>just
>> >> >>>> adding more tags.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Remember that commits always land in master first. Regression
>>fixes
>> >> >>> should
>> >> >>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to master.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Braden
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong
>><wjamesjong@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted
somewhere?
>> I
>> >> >>>>>didn't
>> >> >>>>> see it searching through the emails.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> -James Jong
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson
>> >><braden@chromium.org
>> >> >
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> My changes are in.
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on those
pull reqs.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great, otherwise,
not a big
>>deal.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer
>>release/branching/tagging
>> >> >>> approach
>> >> >>>>> we
>> >> >>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and let's
decide if we
>>want to
>> >> >>>>>>>use
>> >> >>> it
>> >> >>>>> or
>> >> >>>>>>> not)?
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer
upload/download and
>> >>the
>> >> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in as well
- also seeing if
>>the
>> >> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works to
test. Was planning
>>on
>> >> >>>>>>>>pulling
>> >> >>>>> in
>> >> >>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not have
time, but it seems
>> >>Andrew
>> >> >>>>>>>>is
>> >> >>> on
>> >> >>>>> it
>> >> >>>>>>>> already :)
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden
Shepherdson
>> >> >>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of the
plugin JS loading logic
>> >>into
>> >> >>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
>> >> >>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then it
will be possible to play
>> >>with
>> >> >>>>> plugman
>> >> >>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge
JS. Note that this logic
>> >> >>>>>>>>>won't be
>> >> >>>>>>>>> active
>> >> >>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't
be a high-risk
>> >>change to
>> >> >>>>> slide
>> >> >>>>>>>>> in
>> >> >>>>>>>>> before a release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew
Grieve <
>> >> >>> agrieve@chromium.org
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through pull
requests today. Makes
>> >>sense
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>to
>> >> >>> get
>> >> >>>>>>>>> those
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the release.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM,
James Jong
>> >> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd like
to see get into 2.6:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog to
the Notification API
>>(completed,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>just
>> >> >>>>>>>>> needs
>> >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM,
Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that huge
thread on the list w/ the docs..
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at
3:22 PM, Filip Maj
>><fil@adobe.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even brought
back the new method to the
>>list
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
>> >> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> F2F?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21 PM,
"Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets give
this new method a go.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19,
2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
>> >><fil@adobe.com>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we feeling
for that? Are there any outstanding
>> >>features
>> >> >>> out
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> there
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on the
cusp of landing, or can we go into rc +
>>test
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message