cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:43:53 GMT
Sorry for the bug, Jesse :(

I can commit a fix shortly. I'll cherry-pick it into 2.6.x and then we can
decide whether to retag rc1 or create rc2.

Braden



On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> Since we haven't released anything yet, can we simply retag the rc1 and
> push a new commit to the 2.6.x branches out there?
>
> On 3/27/13 11:25 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Windows platforms cannot load the JS generated by cordova-js.
> >The deviceready event does not fire because of an exception fired in the
> >XHR loading code added by Braden here [1]
> >
> >If I wrap the XHR plugin loading code :
> >
> >    try {
> >        // Try to XHR the cordova_plugins.json file asynchronously.
> >   ...
> >
> >   }
> >   catch(err)
> >{
> >  finishPluginLoading();
> >}
> >
> >Then all is good.
> >Do we re-tag, move on to rc2, or should I just patch WP7+WP8 ?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >  Jesse
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >[1]
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=f97bd6
> >94da3364664776d79c5bbf5e914e8e4f5a
> >
> >
> >
> >@purplecabbage
> >risingj.com
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It's under cordova-labs' jira branch.
> >>
> >> Start at line 151 of jira.js [1]. Increment the num_callbacks var. Check
> >> out the flow a little bit to get an idea of what you need to do. Then
> >> copy/paste to add the new subtasks.
> >>
> >> Cathc me on gtalk if you have more qs.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-labs.git;a=blob;f=jira
> .
> >>js
> >> ;h=18a76980566e6972203b92ade12bb21f3a9d79a8;hb=refs/heads/jira#l151
> >>
> >> On 3/22/13 11:35 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Fil,
> >> >Since cordova-osx is functional now -- how do I add JIRA tasks to the
> >> >script (not sure where it is exactly) you used to add subtasks for a
> >> >release? I want to add "Update www/ application for OS X" and "Update
> >> >JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and
> >>the
> >> >> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release
> >>mode!
> >> >>
> >> >> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-James Jong
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also
> >>cherry-pick
> >> >> >> regressions back to more than just the current release.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong
> >><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches
for each
> >> >>major
> >> >> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release
candidates
> >> >>and
> >> >> >>>minor
> >> >> >>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x,
...
> >> >>branches?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> -James Jong
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson
> >> >><braden@chromium.org>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's
the
> >> >> >>>>(high-level)
> >> >> >>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch.
We're not
> >>using
> >> >>them
> >> >> >>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
> >> >> >>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
> >> >> >>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new
branch
> >>2.6.x)
> >> >> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
> >> >> >>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x)
not the
> >>point
> >> >> >>> release
> >> >> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1,
2.6.0rc2,
> >>etc.
> >> >>and
> >> >> >>> then
> >> >> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x
branch as
> >>well,
> >> >>just
> >> >> >>>> adding more tags.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Remember that commits always land in master first.
Regression
> >>fixes
> >> >> >>> should
> >> >> >>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to
master.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Braden
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong
> >><wjamesjong@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted
somewhere?
> >> I
> >> >> >>>>>didn't
> >> >> >>>>> see it searching through the emails.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> -James Jong
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> >> >><braden@chromium.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> My changes are in.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on
those pull reqs.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great,
otherwise, not a big
> >>deal.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer
> >>release/branching/tagging
> >> >> >>> approach
> >> >> >>>>> we
> >> >> >>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and
let's decide if we
> >>want to
> >> >> >>>>>>>use
> >> >> >>> it
> >> >> >>>>> or
> >> >> >>>>>>> not)?
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer
upload/download and
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in
as well - also seeing if
> >>the
> >> >> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works
to test. Was planning
> >>on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>pulling
> >> >> >>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not
have time, but it seems
> >> >>Andrew
> >> >> >>>>>>>>is
> >> >> >>> on
> >> >> >>>>> it
> >> >> >>>>>>>> already :)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden
Shepherdson
> >> >> >>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of
the plugin JS loading logic
> >> >>into
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then
it will be possible to play
> >> >>with
> >> >> >>>>> plugman
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge
JS. Note that this logic
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>won't be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> active
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it
shouldn't be a high-risk
> >> >>change to
> >> >> >>>>> slide
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> before a release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20
AM, Andrew Grieve <
> >> >> >>> agrieve@chromium.org
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a
release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through
pull requests today. Makes
> >> >>sense
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>to
> >> >> >>> get
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> those
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the
release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49
AM, James Jong
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd
like to see get into 2.6:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera
implementation
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog
to the Notification API
> >>(completed,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>just
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> needs
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46
PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that
huge thread on the list w/ the docs..
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013
at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj
> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even
brought back the new method to the
> >>list
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> F2F?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21
PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets
give this new method a go.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar
19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we
feeling for that? Are there any outstanding
> >> >>features
> >> >> >>> out
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> there
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on
the cusp of landing, or can we go into rc +
> >>test
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message