cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:03:33 GMT
Wait, what did you try to do?

I just cherry-picked your commit into master and pushed it, so that's
sorted.

If you tried to merge (in either direction) then no, it wouldn't work, and
we should never do that.

Braden

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just tried, seems I have pulled in the other commits though ... fml
>
>
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the bug, Jesse :(
> >
> > I can commit a fix shortly. I'll cherry-pick it into 2.6.x and then we
> can
> > decide whether to retag rc1 or create rc2.
> >
> > Braden
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since we haven't released anything yet, can we simply retag the rc1 and
> > > push a new commit to the 2.6.x branches out there?
> > >
> > > On 3/27/13 11:25 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Windows platforms cannot load the JS generated by cordova-js.
> > > >The deviceready event does not fire because of an exception fired in
> the
> > > >XHR loading code added by Braden here [1]
> > > >
> > > >If I wrap the XHR plugin loading code :
> > > >
> > > >    try {
> > > >        // Try to XHR the cordova_plugins.json file asynchronously.
> > > >   ...
> > > >
> > > >   }
> > > >   catch(err)
> > > >{
> > > >  finishPluginLoading();
> > > >}
> > > >
> > > >Then all is good.
> > > >Do we re-tag, move on to rc2, or should I just patch WP7+WP8 ?
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >  Jesse
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >[1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=f97bd6
> > > >94da3364664776d79c5bbf5e914e8e4f5a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >@purplecabbage
> > > >risingj.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It's under cordova-labs' jira branch.
> > > >>
> > > >> Start at line 151 of jira.js [1]. Increment the num_callbacks var.
> > Check
> > > >> out the flow a little bit to get an idea of what you need to do.
> Then
> > > >> copy/paste to add the new subtasks.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cathc me on gtalk if you have more qs.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-labs.git;a=blob;f=jira
> > > .
> > > >>js
> > > >> ;h=18a76980566e6972203b92ade12bb21f3a9d79a8;hb=refs/heads/jira#l151
> > > >>
> > > >> On 3/22/13 11:35 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Hi Fil,
> > > >> >Since cordova-osx is functional now -- how do I add JIRA tasks
to
> the
> > > >> >script (not sure where it is exactly) you used to add subtasks
for
> a
> > > >> >release? I want to add "Update www/ application for OS X" and
> "Update
> > > >> >JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1,
> and
> > > >>the
> > > >> >> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo
> release
> > > >>mode!
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >-James Jong
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We
may also
> > > >>cherry-pick
> > > >> >> >> regressions back to more than just the current release.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong
> > > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living'
branches for
> > each
> > > >> >>major
> > > >> >> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for
release
> > candidates
> > > >> >>and
> > > >> >> >>>minor
> > > >> >> >>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x
, 3.0.x, ...
> > > >> >>branches?
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>> -James Jong
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson
> > > >> >><braden@chromium.org>
> > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>>> I meant to send an email about this last
night. Here's the
> > > >> >> >>>>(high-level)
> > > >> >> >>>> process we'll need to follow for each of
the repos.
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next'
branch. We're not
> > > >>using
> > > >> >>them
> > > >> >> >>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
> > > >> >> >>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
> > > >> >> >>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're
on the new branch
> > > >>2.6.x)
> > > >> >> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
> > > >> >> >>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision
(ie. 2.6.x) not the
> > > >>point
> > > >> >> >>> release
> > > >> >> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called
2.6.0rc1,
> 2.6.0rc2,
> > > >>etc.
> > > >> >>and
> > > >> >> >>> then
> > > >> >> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this
2.6.x branch as
> > > >>well,
> > > >> >>just
> > > >> >> >>>> adding more tags.
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> Remember that commits always land in master
first.
> Regression
> > > >>fixes
> > > >> >> >>> should
> > > >> >> >>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed
to master.
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> Braden
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James
Jong
> > > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> Is the new release branching process
for 2.6 posted
> > somewhere?
> > > >> I
> > > >> >> >>>>>didn't
> > > >> >> >>>>> see it searching through the emails.
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> -James Jong
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden
Shepherdson
> > > >> >><braden@chromium.org
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> My changes are in.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM,
Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need
to wait on those pull reqs.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time,
great, otherwise, not a
> big
> > > >>deal.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the
newer
> > > >>release/branching/tagging
> > > >> >> >>> approach
> > > >> >> >>>>> we
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face
(and let's decide if we
> > > >>want to
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>use
> > > >> >> >>> it
> > > >> >> >>>>> or
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> not)?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron"
<shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52
for FileTransfer upload/download
> > and
> > > >> >>the
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar
re-fix in as well - also seeing
> > if
> > > >>the
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec
stuff works to test. Was
> planning
> > > >>on
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>pulling
> > > >> >> >>>>> in
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but
may not have time, but it
> seems
> > > >> >>Andrew
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>is
> > > >> >> >>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>> it
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> already :)
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at
8:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling
some of the plugin JS loading
> > logic
> > > >> >>into
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> If that makes this release
then it will be possible to
> > play
> > > >> >>with
> > > >> >> >>>>> plugman
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> without also needing
bleeding-edge JS. Note that this
> > logic
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>won't be
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> active
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins,
so it shouldn't be a high-risk
> > > >> >>change to
> > > >> >> >>>>> slide
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> in
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> before a release.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013
at 11:20 AM, Andrew Grieve <
> > > >> >> >>> agrieve@chromium.org
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right
for a release.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on
going through pull requests today.
> Makes
> > > >> >>sense
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>to
> > > >> >> >>> get
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> those
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> all in before starting
the release.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20,
2013 at 6:49 AM, James Jong
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> A couple of
items I'd like to see get into 2.6:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF
camera implementation
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt
dialog to the Notification API
> > > >>(completed,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>just
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> needs
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013,
at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <
> b@brian.io>
> > > >> >>wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden
put that huge thread on the list w/ the
> > docs..
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue,
Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj
> > > >><fil@adobe.com>
> > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha
have we even brought back the new method to
> the
> > > >>list
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> F2F?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13
3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, lets give this new method a go.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
> > > >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How we feeling for that? Are there any
> outstanding
> > > >> >>features
> > > >> >> >>> out
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> there
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
are on the cusp of landing, or can we go into rc
> +
> > > >>test
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message