cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:46:58 GMT
I just tried, seems I have pulled in the other commits though ... fml



@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org>wrote:

> Sorry for the bug, Jesse :(
>
> I can commit a fix shortly. I'll cherry-pick it into 2.6.x and then we can
> decide whether to retag rc1 or create rc2.
>
> Braden
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Since we haven't released anything yet, can we simply retag the rc1 and
> > push a new commit to the 2.6.x branches out there?
> >
> > On 3/27/13 11:25 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Windows platforms cannot load the JS generated by cordova-js.
> > >The deviceready event does not fire because of an exception fired in the
> > >XHR loading code added by Braden here [1]
> > >
> > >If I wrap the XHR plugin loading code :
> > >
> > >    try {
> > >        // Try to XHR the cordova_plugins.json file asynchronously.
> > >   ...
> > >
> > >   }
> > >   catch(err)
> > >{
> > >  finishPluginLoading();
> > >}
> > >
> > >Then all is good.
> > >Do we re-tag, move on to rc2, or should I just patch WP7+WP8 ?
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >  Jesse
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >[1]
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=f97bd6
> > >94da3364664776d79c5bbf5e914e8e4f5a
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >@purplecabbage
> > >risingj.com
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's under cordova-labs' jira branch.
> > >>
> > >> Start at line 151 of jira.js [1]. Increment the num_callbacks var.
> Check
> > >> out the flow a little bit to get an idea of what you need to do. Then
> > >> copy/paste to add the new subtasks.
> > >>
> > >> Cathc me on gtalk if you have more qs.
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-labs.git;a=blob;f=jira
> > .
> > >>js
> > >> ;h=18a76980566e6972203b92ade12bb21f3a9d79a8;hb=refs/heads/jira#l151
> > >>
> > >> On 3/22/13 11:35 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Hi Fil,
> > >> >Since cordova-osx is functional now -- how do I add JIRA tasks to the
> > >> >script (not sure where it is exactly) you used to add subtasks for
a
> > >> >release? I want to add "Update www/ application for OS X" and "Update
> > >> >JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1,
and
> > >>the
> > >> >> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release
> > >>mode!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >-James Jong
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also
> > >>cherry-pick
> > >> >> >> regressions back to more than just the current release.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong
> > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches
for
> each
> > >> >>major
> > >> >> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release
> candidates
> > >> >>and
> > >> >> >>>minor
> > >> >> >>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x
, 3.0.x, ...
> > >> >>branches?
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> -James Jong
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson
> > >> >><braden@chromium.org>
> > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>>> I meant to send an email about this last night.
Here's the
> > >> >> >>>>(high-level)
> > >> >> >>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the
repos.
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch.
We're not
> > >>using
> > >> >>them
> > >> >> >>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
> > >> >> >>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
> > >> >> >>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on
the new branch
> > >>2.6.x)
> > >> >> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
> > >> >> >>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie.
2.6.x) not the
> > >>point
> > >> >> >>> release
> > >> >> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1,
2.6.0rc2,
> > >>etc.
> > >> >>and
> > >> >> >>> then
> > >> >> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x
branch as
> > >>well,
> > >> >>just
> > >> >> >>>> adding more tags.
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> Remember that commits always land in master first.
Regression
> > >>fixes
> > >> >> >>> should
> > >> >> >>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed
to master.
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> Braden
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong
> > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> Is the new release branching process for
2.6 posted
> somewhere?
> > >> I
> > >> >> >>>>>didn't
> > >> >> >>>>> see it searching through the emails.
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> -James Jong
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> > >> >><braden@chromium.org
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> My changes are in.
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait
on those pull reqs.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great,
otherwise, not a big
> > >>deal.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer
> > >>release/branching/tagging
> > >> >> >>> approach
> > >> >> >>>>> we
> > >> >> >>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face
(and let's decide if we
> > >>want to
> > >> >> >>>>>>>use
> > >> >> >>> it
> > >> >> >>>>> or
> > >> >> >>>>>>> not)?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer
upload/download
> and
> > >> >>the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix
in as well - also seeing
> if
> > >>the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff
works to test. Was planning
> > >>on
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>pulling
> > >> >> >>>>> in
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may
not have time, but it seems
> > >> >>Andrew
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>is
> > >> >> >>> on
> > >> >> >>>>> it
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> already :)
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50
AM, Braden Shepherdson
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some
of the plugin JS loading
> logic
> > >> >>into
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> If that makes this release
then it will be possible to
> play
> > >> >>with
> > >> >> >>>>> plugman
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge
JS. Note that this
> logic
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>won't be
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> active
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins,
so it shouldn't be a high-risk
> > >> >>change to
> > >> >> >>>>> slide
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> in
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> before a release.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20
AM, Andrew Grieve <
> > >> >> >>> agrieve@chromium.org
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right
for a release.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going
through pull requests today. Makes
> > >> >>sense
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>to
> > >> >> >>> get
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> those
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> all in before starting
the release.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013
at 6:49 AM, James Jong
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items
I'd like to see get into 2.6:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera
implementation
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt
dialog to the Notification API
> > >>(completed,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>just
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> needs
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013,
at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > >> >>wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put
that huge thread on the list w/ the
> docs..
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19,
2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj
> > >><fil@adobe.com>
> > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have
we even brought back the new method to the
> > >>list
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> F2F?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13
3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io>
> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes,
lets give this new method a go.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue,
Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
> > >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
we feeling for that? Are there any outstanding
> > >> >>features
> > >> >> >>> out
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> there
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
on the cusp of landing, or can we go into rc +
> > >>test
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message