cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: [cordova-cli] ripple instead of serve
Date Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:03:06 GMT
Dan, my brother showed me this (he is mechatronics student at UW).  Is it
still on tomorrow?


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Dan Silivestru <dan.silivestru@gmail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> Sorry I'm late to the game, I was judging frisbee throwing, pyramid
> climbing robots all day :-)
>
> https://twitter.com/confusement/status/315162754619162625
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > K lets try to land it in 2.6.0rc1. There is still time Gord! Blackberry +
> > iOS not tagged yet so we can land some more commits in cordova-cli
> >
> > On 3/22/13 3:02 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >
> > >Like that plan. Say we proceed and land it in 2.6 to feel out.
> > >
> > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >> I'm fine with removing server. In my mind ripple is just a serve
> command
> > >> on steroids. At this morning's meeting I believe some of the Googlers
> > >> expressed concerns about axing out serve, so perhaps a prudent first
> > >>step
> > >> would be to add Ripple as an `emulate` command and then we can take
> baby
> > >> steps to extract out serve over the coming weeks.
> > >>
> > >> On 3/22/13 2:45 PM, "Gord Tanner" <gtanner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have it added as a
> > >>>seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1]
> > >>>
> > >>>Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we knew we needed
> > >>>(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding the ability
> to
> > >>>serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support www/ merged
> with
> > >>>platform/www/).
> > >>>
> > >>>Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate or merge
> this
> > >>>in
> > >>>as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime)
> > >>>
> > >>>[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple
> > >>>[2] -
> > >>>
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd
> > >>>if
> > >>>f;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528
> > >>>[3] -
> > >>>
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd
> > >>>if
> > >>>f;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> > >>>wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thats awesome ;)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner <gtanner@gmail.com>
> > >>>>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Yeah Michal,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > That is the exact use case I had in mind.  When we were a
startup
> we
> > >>>> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all
our
> > >>>>contract
> > >>>> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <
> mmocny@chromium.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Very interesting.  Combined with Bradens proposal to
support
> > >>>>pointing
> > >>>> to
> > >>>> > a
> > >>>> > > local platform, looks very good.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support
on a
> > >>>>given
> > >>>> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux
box
> > >>>>through
> > >>>> > > Ripple.
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use
case vs
> lazy
> > >>>>load
> > >>>> > > > vendoring
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > caching could be a future thing
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > might be a really nice path
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner
> > >>>><gtanner@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > +1
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to
add a platform
> > >>>>to a
> > >>>> > > project
> > >>>> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is
still usable if
> we
> > >>>>can't
> > >>>> > > > build/deploy
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions.
It was
> > >>>>mentioned
> > >>>> in
> > >>>> > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement
that ./serve
> > >>>>goes
> > >>>> > away
> > >>>> > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command.
But lets
> > >>>>discuss.
> > >>>> (Just
> > >>>> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.)
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Silivestru
> +1 (519) 589-3624
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message