cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [cordova-cli] ripple instead of serve
Date Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:45:12 GMT
Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have it added as a
seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1]

Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we knew we needed
(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding the ability to
serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support www/ merged with
platform/www/).

Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate or merge this in
as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime)

[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple
[2] -
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitdiff;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528
[3] -
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thats awesome ;)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner <gtanner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah Michal,
> >
> > That is the exact use case I had in mind.  When we were a startup we
> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all our contract
> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Very interesting.  Combined with Bradens proposal to support pointing
> to
> > a
> > > local platform, looks very good.
> > >
> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support on a given
> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux box through
> > > Ripple.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case vs lazy load
> > > > vendoring
> > > >
> > > > caching could be a future thing
> > > >
> > > > might be a really nice path
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner <gtanner@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a platform to a
> > > project
> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still usable if we can't
> > > > build/deploy
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It was mentioned
> in
> > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that ./serve goes
> > away
> > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets discuss.
> (Just
> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message