cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: device motion plugin
Date Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:05:31 GMT
I don't think it should go in for 2.6.0 as well, for the already mentioned
reasons.


On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't try to shove this in for 2.6.0.
> Regressions only at this point (since the branches have been cut).
>
> Excited to see progress here though!
>
> by namespace - are you referring to Java namespaces? or plugin IDs?
>
> To answer your question about the JS, refer to this thread:
> http://callback.markmail.org/thread/vxmd3yrr5i5q27w3
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > Last week I did some work around pulling out the Accelerometer plugin
> from
> > the cordova-android code and setting up how the plugin repo would look. I
> > have gone ahead and pushed my work onto the newly created device motion
> > repo (
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-plugin-device-motion.git;a=summary
> > ).
> >
> > A couple questions have arisen from this work:
> >
> > 1) How are we handling the JS? I assume we will be pulling it out of
> > cordova.js and packaging it with the plugin.
> >
> > 2) How are we namespacing the plugins? core.name vs name.name? A
> > discussion
> > about this was happening in a earlier thread. (
> >
> >
> http://callback.markmail.org/message/pbeovtkzi3a2tfkw?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecallback-dev+moving+plugins+to+core+namespace
> > ).
> >
> > Once we come to a consensus about these two questions, I can start
> ripping
> > out more plugins from cordova-android and start populating our new plugin
> > repos.
> >
> > Durring releases, I would just run plugman to include the api back into
> the
> > release (tests required).
> >
> > I am going to work with Shaz this week to rip out the Accel plugin from
> iOS
> > and get it setup on the same repo.
> >
> >
> > I know there was some talk about ripping out this plugin for 2.6.0
> release.
> > How do you guys feel about this? 2.6.0 is schedule to go out end of this
> > week?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Steve
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message