cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:23:33 GMT
Tagging iOS. Although there were a few fix commits after the initial rc1
tag. No biggie if no one downloaded it, but I'd rather do a new tag next
time for this situation (since this fix is not critical for iOS).


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> JS is re-tagged and the 2.6.0rc1 issue tasks in JIRA are
> reopened/commented upon to make it clear which SHA to use from the JS.
>
> GOGO tagging!
>
> Thx all,
> Fil
>
> On 3/27/13 1:08 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >perfect, thanks.
> >
> >
> >@purplecabbage
> >risingj.com
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. I'll retag the JS and re-open the other tag issues in JIRA to
> >>re-copy
> >> the JS and and re-tag once that is done on the 2.6.x branch.
> >>
> >> On 3/27/13 12:11 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Yeah, I originally did a merge by accident, I then force overwrote that
> >> >commit with just the change ...
> >> >All looks good now.
> >> >
> >> >So re-tag?
> >> >
> >> >@purplecabbage
> >> >risingj.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> >> ><braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Wait, what did you try to do?
> >> >>
> >> >> I just cherry-picked your commit into master and pushed it, so that's
> >> >> sorted.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you tried to merge (in either direction) then no, it wouldn't
> >>work,
> >> >>and
> >> >> we should never do that.
> >> >>
> >> >> Braden
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > I just tried, seems I have pulled in the other commits though
...
> >>fml
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > @purplecabbage
> >> >> > risingj.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Braden Shepherdson <
> >> >> braden@chromium.org
> >> >> > >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Sorry for the bug, Jesse :(
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I can commit a fix shortly. I'll cherry-pick it into 2.6.x
and
> >>then
> >> >>we
> >> >> > can
> >> >> > > decide whether to retag rc1 or create rc2.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Braden
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > Since we haven't released anything yet, can we simply
retag the
> >> >>rc1
> >> >> and
> >> >> > > > push a new commit to the 2.6.x branches out there?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > On 3/27/13 11:25 AM, "Jesse" <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > >Windows platforms cannot load the JS generated by
cordova-js.
> >> >> > > > >The deviceready event does not fire because of an
exception
> >> >>fired in
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > > > >XHR loading code added by Braden here [1]
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >If I wrap the XHR plugin loading code :
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >    try {
> >> >> > > > >        // Try to XHR the cordova_plugins.json file
> >> >>asynchronously.
> >> >> > > > >   ...
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >   }
> >> >> > > > >   catch(err)
> >> >> > > > >{
> >> >> > > > >  finishPluginLoading();
> >> >> > > > >}
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >Then all is good.
> >> >> > > > >Do we re-tag, move on to rc2, or should I just patch
WP7+WP8 ?
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >Cheers,
> >> >> > > > >  Jesse
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >[1]
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=f97bd
> >> >>6
> >> >> > > > >94da3364664776d79c5bbf5e914e8e4f5a
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >@purplecabbage
> >> >> > > > >risingj.com
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >> It's under cordova-labs' jira branch.
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >> Start at line 151 of jira.js [1]. Increment
the
> >>num_callbacks
> >> >>var.
> >> >> > > Check
> >> >> > > > >> out the flow a little bit to get an idea of
what you need to
> >> >>do.
> >> >> > Then
> >> >> > > > >> copy/paste to add the new subtasks.
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >> Cathc me on gtalk if you have more qs.
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >> [1]
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > >
> >> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-labs.git;a=blob;f=jira
> >> >> > > > .
> >> >> > > > >>js
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> ;h=18a76980566e6972203b92ade12bb21f3a9d79a8;hb=refs/heads/jira#l151
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >> On 3/22/13 11:35 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >> >Hi Fil,
> >> >> > > > >> >Since cordova-osx is functional now --
how do I add JIRA
> >> >>tasks to
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > > > >> >script (not sure where it is exactly) you
used to add
> >>subtasks
> >> >> for
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > > > >> >release? I want to add "Update www/ application
for OS X"
> >>and
> >> >> > "Update
> >> >> > > > >> >JavaScript for OS X" sub-tasks.
> >> >> > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js
are tagged
> >> >>2.6.0rc1,
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > > > >>the
> >> >> > > > >> >> 2.6.x branches on both those repos
are now pushed up.
> >>Gogo
> >> >> > release
> >> >> > > > >>mode!
> >> >> > > > >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >Nice.  Thanks Michal.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> >-James Jong
> >> >> > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> >On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM,
Michal Mocny <
> >> >> mmocny@chromium.org
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> >> Yes, the intent is to have
living branches.  We may
> >>also
> >> >> > > > >>cherry-pick
> >> >> > > > >> >> >> regressions back to more
than just the current
> >>release.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50
AM, James Jong
> >> >> > > > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> Thanks Braden.  Is the
intent to have 'living'
> >>branches
> >> >>for
> >> >> > > each
> >> >> > > > >> >>major
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0)
which contain tags for
> >>release
> >> >> > > candidates
> >> >> > > > >> >>and
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>minor
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> revisions?  So going
forward we would have 2.6.x ,
> >> >>3.0.x,
> >> >> ...
> >> >> > > > >> >>branches?
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> -James Jong
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36
AM, Braden Shepherdson
> >> >> > > > >> >><braden@chromium.org>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> I meant to send an
email about this last night.
> >>Here's
> >> >>the
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>(high-level)
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> process we'll need
to follow for each of the repos.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Step 0: This time
only, delete the 'next' branch.
> >>We're
> >> >> not
> >> >> > > > >>using
> >> >> > > > >> >>them
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> anymore, and they'll
just add confusion.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Step 1: Checkout
and pull master.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Step 2: git checkout
-b 2.6.x (now you're on the new
> >> >> branch
> >> >> > > > >>2.6.x)
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1
(on the 2.6.x branch)
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Step 4: Push the
branch and tag.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> NB: The branch is
for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x)
> >> >>not
> >> >> the
> >> >> > > > >>point
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> release
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> (2.6.0). The branch
will have tags called 2.6.0rc1,
> >> >> > 2.6.0rc2,
> >> >> > > > >>etc.
> >> >> > > > >> >>and
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> then
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1
that we do will be on this 2.6.x
> >> >>branch
> >> >> as
> >> >> > > > >>well,
> >> >> > > > >> >>just
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> adding more tags.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Remember that commits
always land in master first.
> >> >> > Regression
> >> >> > > > >>fixes
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> should
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> be cherry-picked
to 2.6.x after being committed to
> >> >>master.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> Braden
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013
at 10:17 AM, James Jong
> >> >> > > > >><wjamesjong@gmail.com
> >> >> > > > >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> Is the new release
branching process for 2.6 posted
> >> >> > > somewhere?
> >> >> > > > >> I
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>didn't
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> see it searching
through the emails.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> -James Jong
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> On Mar 20, 2013,
at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson
> >> >> > > > >> >><braden@chromium.org
> >> >> > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>> My changes
are in.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar
20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <
> >> >> fil@adobe.com
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> Alright
sounds like we need to wait on those pull
> >> >>reqs.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> Braden,
if you get it in time, great, otherwise,
> >> >>not a
> >> >> > big
> >> >> > > > >>deal.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> Related:
can someone recap the newer
> >> >> > > > >>release/branching/tagging
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> approach
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> we
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> talked
about at the face-to-face (and let's
> >>decide
> >> >>if
> >> >> we
> >> >> > > > >>want to
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>use
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> it
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> or
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> not)?
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>> On 3/20/13
9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm
trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer
> >> >> upload/download
> >> >> > > and
> >> >> > > > >> >>the
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar
re-fix in as well -
> >>also
> >> >> seeing
> >> >> > > if
> >> >> > > > >>the
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> FileTransfer
mobile-spec stuff works to test.
> >>Was
> >> >> > planning
> >> >> > > > >>on
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>pulling
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> in
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> the
iOS pull requests but may not have time,
> >>but it
> >> >> > seems
> >> >> > > > >> >>Andrew
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>is
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> on
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> it
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> already
:)
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> On
Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden
> >>Shepherdson
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
I'm working on rolling some of the plugin JS
> >> >>loading
> >> >> > > logic
> >> >> > > > >> >>into
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
cordova-js.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
If that makes this release then it will be
> >> >>possible
> >> >> to
> >> >> > > play
> >> >> > > > >> >>with
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> plugman
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
without also needing bleeding-edge JS. Note
> >>that
> >> >>this
> >> >> > > logic
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>won't
be
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
active
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't be a
> >> >> high-risk
> >> >> > > > >> >>change to
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>> slide
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
in
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
before a release.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew
> >>Grieve <
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> agrieve@chromium.org
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
Time's feeling right for a release.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
I'm planning on going through pull requests
> >> >>today.
> >> >> > Makes
> >> >> > > > >> >>sense
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>to
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> get
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
those
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
all in before starting the release.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM, James Jong
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
A couple of items I'd like to see get into
> >>2.6:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
2) adding prompt dialog to the Notification
> >>API
> >> >> > > > >>(completed,
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>just
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
needs
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
to
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
be merged in)
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
-James Jong
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <
> >> >> > b@brian.io>
> >> >> > > > >> >>wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Ya braden put that huge thread on the list
> >>w/
> >> >>the
> >> >> > > docs..
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >> > > > >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Haha have we even brought back the new
> >>method
> >> >>to
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > > > >>list
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>since
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
the
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
F2F?
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 3/19/13 3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux"
> >> >><b@brian.io>
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, lets give this new method a go.
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >> > > > >> >><fil@adobe.com>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
wrote:
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How we feeling for that? Are there any
> >> >> > outstanding
> >> >> > > > >> >>features
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> out
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
there
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
are on the cusp of landing, or can we go
> >> >>into
> >> >> rc
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > > > >>test
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
soon-ish?
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >>>
> >> >> > > > >> >> >
> >> >> > > > >> >>
> >> >> > > > >> >>
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > > >>
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message