cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:03:09 GMT
I think your prioritization is correct. It would be great to ship w/
our docs but no rush.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson
<braden@chromium.org> wrote:
> Yes, that's on my list of things to do. I'm making progress along that
> list, but it's currently outrunning me.
>
> Do people like the idea of putting this doc into the docs.cordova.io docs?
> Or do we prefer to keep contributor-related things in the wiki? If the
> latter, it can wait, but if the former then I should probably commit it
> very soon.
>
> Braden
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
>> Braden also published this detailed guide for contributors on the topic:
>>
>>
>> https://googledrive.com/host/0B8sLcyOAEX-XUHAxNXhISE5rTTg/guide_contributing_index.md.html
>>
>> (Which I'm guessing will make its way into our docs proper?)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and the
>> > 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release mode!
>> >
>> > On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Nice.  Thanks Michal.
>> >>
>> >>-James Jong
>> >>
>> >>On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also cherry-pick
>> >>> regressions back to more than just the current release.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches for each
major
>> >>>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release candidates
and
>> >>>>minor
>> >>>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x, ...
>> branches?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -James Jong
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org
>> >
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's the
>> >>>>>(high-level)
>> >>>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch. We're not
using
>> them
>> >>>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
>> >>>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
>> >>>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new branch
2.6.x)
>> >>>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
>> >>>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x) not the
point
>> >>>> release
>> >>>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1, 2.6.0rc2,
etc.
>> and
>> >>>> then
>> >>>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x branch as
well,
>> just
>> >>>>> adding more tags.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Remember that commits always land in master first. Regression
fixes
>> >>>> should
>> >>>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to master.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Braden
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted somewhere?
 I
>> >>>>>>didn't
>> >>>>>> see it searching through the emails.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -James Jong
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson <
>> braden@chromium.org>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My changes are in.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on those pull
reqs.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great, otherwise,
not a big deal.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer release/branching/tagging
>> >>>> approach
>> >>>>>> we
>> >>>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and let's decide
if we want to
>> >>>>>>>>use
>> >>>> it
>> >>>>>> or
>> >>>>>>>> not)?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer upload/download
and the
>> >>>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in as well -
also seeing if the
>> >>>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works to test.
Was planning on
>> >>>>>>>>>pulling
>> >>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not have time,
but it seems Andrew
>> >>>>>>>>>is
>> >>>> on
>> >>>>>> it
>> >>>>>>>>> already :)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson
>> >>>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of the plugin
JS loading logic into
>> >>>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
>> >>>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then it will
be possible to play with
>> >>>>>> plugman
>> >>>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge JS. Note
that this logic
>> >>>>>>>>>>won't be
>> >>>>>>>>>> active
>> >>>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't
be a high-risk change
>> to
>> >>>>>> slide
>> >>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>> before a release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew
Grieve <
>> >>>> agrieve@chromium.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through pull requests
today. Makes sense
>> >>>>>>>>>>>to
>> >>>> get
>> >>>>>>>>>> those
>> >>>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM, James
Jong
>> >>>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd like to see
get into 2.6:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog to the Notification
API (completed,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>just
>> >>>>>>>>>> needs
>> >>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Brian
LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that huge thread
on the list w/ the docs..
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22
PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even brought
back the new method to the list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>since
>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> F2F?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21 PM, "Brian
LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets give this
new method a go.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013
at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we feeling for
that? Are there any outstanding
>> features
>> >>>> out
>> >>>>>>>>>>> there
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on the cusp
of landing, or can we go into rc + test
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
>> >>>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message