cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: tag 2.6.0rc1 soon?
Date Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:58:11 GMT
Braden also published this detailed guide for contributors on the topic:

https://googledrive.com/host/0B8sLcyOAEX-XUHAxNXhISE5rTTg/guide_contributing_index.md.html

(Which I'm guessing will make its way into our docs proper?)


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and the
> 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release mode!
>
> On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <wjamesjong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Nice.  Thanks Michal.
>>
>>-James Jong
>>
>>On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the intent is to have living branches.  We may also cherry-pick
>>> regressions back to more than just the current release.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Braden.  Is the intent to have 'living' branches for each major
>>>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release candidates and
>>>>minor
>>>> revisions?  So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x, ... branches?
>>>>
>>>> -James Jong
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's the
>>>>>(high-level)
>>>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos.
>>>>>
>>>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch. We're not using them
>>>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion.
>>>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master.
>>>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new branch 2.6.x)
>>>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch)
>>>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x) not the point
>>>> release
>>>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1, 2.6.0rc2, etc. and
>>>> then
>>>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x branch as well, just
>>>>> adding more tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember that commits always land in master first. Regression fixes
>>>> should
>>>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to master.
>>>>>
>>>>> Braden
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong <wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted somewhere?  I
>>>>>>didn't
>>>>>> see it searching through the emails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -James Jong
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My changes are in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on those pull reqs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great, otherwise, not a big
deal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer release/branching/tagging
>>>> approach
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and let's decide if we
want to
>>>>>>>>use
>>>> it
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> not)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer upload/download
and the
>>>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in as well - also seeing
if the
>>>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works to test. Was planning
on
>>>>>>>>>pulling
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not have time, but it seems
Andrew
>>>>>>>>>is
>>>> on
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> already :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson
>>>>>>>>> <braden@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of the plugin JS loading
logic into
>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js.
>>>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then it will be possible
to play with
>>>>>> plugman
>>>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge JS. Note that
this logic
>>>>>>>>>>won't be
>>>>>>>>>> active
>>>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't be a high-risk
change to
>>>>>> slide
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> before a release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>>>> agrieve@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through pull requests today.
Makes sense
>>>>>>>>>>>to
>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM, James Jong
>>>>>>>>>>><wjamesjong@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd like to see get into
2.6:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog to the Notification
API (completed,
>>>>>>>>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> be merged in)
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux
<b@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that huge thread on the
list w/ the docs..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip
Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even brought back the
new method to the list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>since
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> F2F?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux"
<b@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets give this new method
a go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24
PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we feeling for that?
Are there any outstanding features
>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on the cusp of landing,
or can we go into rc + test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode
>>>>>>>>>>> soon-ish?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message