cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Wallis <kwal...@blackberry.com>
Subject Re: [Android] Plugins to send on the ice flows to die
Date Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:16:32 GMT
What spec is that? I would like to research that, I was not aware there was a new one.

Thanks!

Sent from my BlackBerry Z10 smartphone.
From: Shazron
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 8:43 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Android] Plugins to send on the ice flows to die


Andrew: Capture API. But that's going away I reckon as well (there is a new
spec)


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> What's the alternative to Camera?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 geo and websql deprecation
> >
> > I would wait on camera until we actually do the api audit
> >
> > On 3/22/13 2:54 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hey
> > >
> > >I'm currently looking through the plugins, and I'm thinking more and
> > >more that Android has at least two plugins that I would like to see no
> > >longer maintained once we break them off of the main repository.
> > >
> > >Geolocation:
> > >-------------------
> > >Our Geolocation doesn't actually give us anything that the browser
> > >doesn't do. I think that GPS could be done better, and that the spec
> > >sucks. However our core plugins are supposed to follow the spec, and
> > >since the browser on Android does this much better, there's no point
> > >for this plugin to exist.
> > >
> > >WebSQL Storage:
> > >----------------------------
> > >Our WebSQL storage is pretty brittle and is just a shim to the raw
> > >SQLite that Android creates. There's no real exception handling, and
> > >this could easily crash. I would like to deprecate this and point
> > >people to a third party plugin if they need their SQLite done.
> > >
> > >Camera
> > >--------------
> > >Also, we need to figure out how we capture things. It'd be good if we
> > >picked one way to do this over the other. Right now mobile-spec seems
> > >to use the Camera API, which I don't think is correct. We need to
> > >write a new test for this, because right now this isn't well tested.
> > >I'd like to send the old Camera API on the ice flow in favour of
> > >capture and the native URI handling.
> > >
> > >Thoughts on this?
> > >
> > >Joe
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged
material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges),
or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized
and may be unlawful.

Mime
View raw message