Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.78 as permitted sender)
From: Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:48:40 -0800
Subject: Re: refactoring mobile spec (was: Creating repos for core plugins)
Thread-Topic: refactoring mobile spec (was: Creating repos for core plugins)
Thread-Index: Ac4Fc/ajGhGlieulQLeELqzWEW4l1Q==
Message-ID: <CD395320.177DE%fil@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABiQX1WvyAtYRR6FH+EPLW4Q1ocdQbaKPBks2897YhQc9q+V6g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

This is definitely what I had envisioned as well..

On 2/7/13 11:13 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

>If someone wants to lead the charge on this angle of the plugin
>splitting-out, that would be awesome. On the priority list though, I think
>it's pretty low.  Right now you have to set up the project file, add the
>JS, and then run the tests. This model will still work when plugins are
>separated out.
>
>
>On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to jump forward too far, but would it make sense to breakup
>> mobile-spec in a similar way so that the tests for a plugin are actually
>> located in the plugin's repo? Then the test and the function under test
>> would be synchronized. And it could potentially open the way for
>> third-parties to supply tests for their own plugins.
>>
>> -- Marcel Kinard
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5839
>>
>>