Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CD8E3D7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40138 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 15:48:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 39888 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 15:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 39850 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2013 15:48:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:48:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:48:08 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jc3so3601557bkc.20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:47:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=09+pnUQIH87rfdN0ZFmFiN3M4JNDgdwDRgFg6jkI9vg=; b=auhfiS/uH+93sWNVWTK1OgwjQjsmt3iu7aNtXtP5zgQRkcE8JkvekDha2WZcx62T6y DxzcrNn9h+4YgmKklTLPqqUwclO/nIbp4vouTj5U56xk8GNdANrhFWhx4M/fIqzwt4Fe edYdbRM1rCHeXSn6uHJ1GROXXWn9v6JRLf4zh4b4Pt7IzDrE2Wf3V2yTT1v5Wf4LQsqV ClKH+uM8MBNOI6GdiuxzB4fzmSeWMteff3+O8KXm/5XIZlgUrR0OdXnrHTXof4pWfuMT e41sB/FNU2C68iXByLEEshe/t26h2zaairaPzrv+rU1sG118llC4n4g1JO/DYy2V+rnT UjyA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=09+pnUQIH87rfdN0ZFmFiN3M4JNDgdwDRgFg6jkI9vg=; b=PRy4Qp+LS14DJLM4bAi2EHsVjF39UkGoYU+2lhzqKrNz1x/UI1zh08rE+i2xB4F3kL pXhPp3PSemfw++je7QcCrRNpG/iWcnn73Lbr+eCmn9a594AcfMmEZahv9y5wYv5IER4D X0qasyq8dVcxm+dPz/VHtZFbVV26WyL/+V8rY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=09+pnUQIH87rfdN0ZFmFiN3M4JNDgdwDRgFg6jkI9vg=; b=WnwfV1oE3fvLZ/bnbZKo8ggiemGYrPJ4dkhJ31pxsIQh91PgvhLV+n8CrTaAjLycLL o3JCZkKuXSto0pL76z4E8S1kjXUhsYSlAw5Q6ytuieDPgPudeI8fI/bH9TmHbCyQqeH6 RgKV7LAX2TWxk+SpwYJVBtLU81Mpwb4nrDPoTQhfGPMWNy4u4dA9pDnHcBxGuG3O8eHB otN9yjhiYkQVR9pYNVOVL52gsOEZMDmHUTWt9yZ2FQq1shtXPBFJ+s1O49ij5bUP/kgP er19aIbVL4SmweOiO14HXnsNpSS0vrNdEuszfg294WPV4gwn+FIJ9SkX9ZGW8wk4LQGS Ogfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.8.219 with SMTP id i27mr8902204bki.21.1361375267753; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:47:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: mmocny@google.com Received: by 10.205.141.197 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:47:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:47:47 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R0XGertkBga_AJYrc-cnEBTc0rs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? From: Michal Mocny To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175742f63d90f404d629e141 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0kGJ2u8d89+QHsY7c25ZWnrNpf9IDZOv3OB8HjcuSb4Mpc31Jht8rj4DJ8xt20DiFwwh1H2SZZmFG9r7o1xNo1R6JHQet8EckhgJbq5fnhYF4TS/ksww/4vyoV/PK/w2YH4+ugSUTuRhCfNAgQkaV5BCwNRjBX/6TdzHKr+hv6qqIAfX/Nn6cUf5ATZkTh39lQTiy X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175742f63d90f404d629e141 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you open remote inspector and copy console output manually? On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron wrote: > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out any errors due > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the previous two > devices. > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron wrote: > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec failures (21 related > to > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a re-tag. The > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested on an iPhone 5 > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same failures. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong >wrote: > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. > >> > >> > From: shazron@gmail.com > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800 > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > >> > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping things up. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we fail, we fail > >> together!!!! > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging. > >> > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the javascript and tagged > >> 2.5.0rc1 > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s > >> > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing tagged/bagged > today. > >> > > >> > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj > wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next branch now and > >> throw > >> > > >>> >things in that? > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > > --0015175742f63d90f404d629e141--