Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A121FE08F for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13759 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 18:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 13732 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 18:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 13724 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2013 18:22:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:22:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmarcelk@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.181] (HELO mail-ia0-f181.google.com) (209.85.210.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:22:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k25so3210523iah.26 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:21:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=i6FAORVWsF4Nyd6aONV7ZnsJWAvFmCzN4yYfVa8yj28=; b=q+zFDbX5c8K2qd48hxEuqiG6I0W1leSpbb3P58leo1pFbEmJVY9PzQXjGDyc/KJjRZ iQDP4mrAbUhMVUGM7wYa2vca+dfKldTos8pBhA9wHAGm61abOytkab+lKXASLrkB0sIj BaJR4lZ8ODvUvPZKkt/zM7CGknLaN8V5HQaMdDXxykU8OffqmvXZqLW91kpQMxh2XEFB MWWpYfC6xbPRQYr09tcvOtg/1mWnQOdbebClOe+RID1Q+4dwDmZdi0jafi9adKOEwRF8 6Sa+tIb/Wc8/yhH27TJWe8f2IXupz1h00VZJQs6ZJLPQEBTvVuCiUWSzZwPB9Xs2jfho Xh+A== X-Received: by 10.50.195.135 with SMTP id ie7mr5011689igc.8.1360261302484; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:21:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from marcelk-macbook.raleigh.ibm.com (bi01p2.nc.us.ibm.com. [129.33.49.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb10sm10638298igb.1.2013.02.07.10.21.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:21:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: refactoring mobile spec (was: Creating repos for core plugins) From: Marcel Kinard In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:21:40 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <005D751E-37E5-4DA8-91A6-28AB49EFBFB3@gmail.com> References: <917CD5D3-4A79-4DE4-8B7A-6D7E932C7728@gmail.com> To: dev@cordova.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't want to jump forward too far, but would it make sense to breakup = mobile-spec in a similar way so that the tests for a plugin are actually = located in the plugin's repo? Then the test and the function under test = would be synchronized. And it could potentially open the way for = third-parties to supply tests for their own plugins. -- Marcel Kinard On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5839