cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: more benchmarking in mobile-spec
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:05:14 GMT
Xhr won't resolve to temp/persistent areas, at least on android :s

On 2/22/13 1:54 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:

>What's XHR like reading something from the TEMP/PERSISTENT areas?
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Check out the latest commit to mobile-spec to see the auto benches. I
>>will
>> work towards integrating with ci.cordova.io.. Eventually. There are so
>> many things to do in that project, I could use volunteers :D
>>
>> Anyways, for a prelim auto bench result, here is what I get on my Galaxy
>> Nexus running Android 4.2.2:
>>
>> Cordova.exec invocations (of Echo/echo plugin): ~3800 per second
>> Cordova.exec callbacks coming back (from Echo/echo plugin): ~3600 per
>> second
>> XHR to the LICENSE file and get contents back (11kb) WITHIN the
>> application www/ folder: ~2 per second
>> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is
>>stored
>> on the TEMP FileSystem: ~135 per second
>> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is
>>stored
>> on the PERSISTENT FileSystem: ~140 per second
>>
>>
>> The FileReader tests create the LICENSE file before the start of the
>> benchmarking, btw.
>>
>> Thoughts/comments/questions/feedback welcome.
>>
>> On 2/20/13 8:29 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> >It's not a bug-fix, so push to master :)
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> K I've got a little bit ready. Just benches:
>> >>
>> >> 1. The # of exec invocations possible in a time interval
>> >> 2. The # of exec callback invocations possible in a time interval
>> >>
>> >> Now my conundrum is: where do I push this to? Next branch? Master? :(
>> >>
>> >> On 2/19/13 12:16 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Awesome stuff Fil! The first one is one that I tried before when
>>doing
>> >>the
>> >> >bridge benchmark and found it to not get accurate results. Had a
>>look
>> >>at
>> >> >the README.md of the second one, and it sounds pretty good. Looking
>> >> >forward
>> >> >to seeing what you come up with :)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Raising this thread from the dead :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm thinking of either http://benchmarkjs.com/ or
>> >> >> https://github.com/akdubya/uubench
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Both apparently support async which is our only requirement AFAIK.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Will mess aboot with adding both to mobile-spec and seeing how
it
>> >>pans
>> >> >>out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/26/12 11:09 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >eh folks, any thoughts on using
>> >> >> >https://github.com/robohornet/robohornet for benching?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message