cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filip Maj <...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:22:19 GMT
The compass error is introduced from Gord's latest change.

The test that is failing is:

 if you create a new CompassHeading object with no parameters, it should
have defined properties.

This commit:

https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/commit/6133a7e05bcd2ddc4a15591cf79cda9
65cbaf1ab


Breaks that (no parameters are defined leads to properties == undefined)

Not a big deal as in practice this won't break anything. We should either
remove the test or add more fine-grained checking into compassHeading.

On 2/20/13 12:44 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

>The FileTransfer errors should go away once I check in the updated js,
>which leaves the compass stuff. I'll investigate the compass stuff before
>committing the updated js.
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> The FileTransferError body property is not implemented yet so that error
>> is fine.
>>
>> The bugs blocking RC are:
>> - The compass ones are new, we should investigate
>> - The FileTransfer is not defined, which was a symbol mapping issue in
>>the
>> JS (which is why all platforms need to grab the new JS test).
>>
>> On 2/20/13 12:37 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Don't think these failures should block rc1, but on iOS, I'm getting
>>that
>> >plus:
>> >
>> >Compass (navigator.compass) Compass Heading model (CompassHeading)
>>should
>> >be able to create a new CompassHeading instance with no
>>
>>>parameters.<file:///var/mobile/Applications/DC5AC5B0-AD05-4B67-884F-6D9A
>>>7F
>> >CE1D6D/250rc1.app/www/autotest/pages/all.html?spec=Compass%20(
>> navigator.co
>>
>>>mpass)%20Compass%20Heading%20model%20(CompassHeading)%20should%20be%20ab
>>>le
>>
>>>%20to%20create%20a%20new%20CompassHeading%20instance%20with%20no%20param
>>>et
>> >ers.>
>> >
>> >Expected undefined to be defined.
>> >
>> >Expected undefined to be defined.
>> >
>> >Expected undefined to be defined.
>> >
>> >FileTransfer download method should get response body on
>>
>>>failure.<file:///var/mobile/Applications/DC5AC5B0-AD05-4B67-884F-6D9A7FC
>>>E1
>>
>>>D6D/250rc1.app/www/autotest/pages/all.html?spec=FileTransfer%20download%
>>>20
>> >method%20should%20get%20response%20body%20on%20failure.>
>> >
>> >Expected null to equal 'You requested a 404'.
>> >
>> >-----------
>> >
>> >
>> >Will investigate
>> >
>> >
>> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Becky Gibson
>> ><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> On iOS I'm failing one of the compass tests:  CompassHeading should
>>be
>> >>able
>> >> to create a new CompassHeading with no parameters.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > K I've updated the JS tag. Platforms should grab the latest
>>2.5.0rc1
>> >>tag
>> >> > from cordova-js and retag + retest.
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2/20/13 12:02 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >Not clear (?) but I think so. I suppose all platforms get the new
>>js
>> >>and
>> >> > >re-test, and re-tag.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> So the JS needs to be retagged ya?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On 2/20/13 11:03 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
>>wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >Not this time actually. This was a refactor in cordova-js
>>where I
>> >> > >>forgot
>> >> > >> >to
>> >> > >> >"git add" the new files. It broke all existing tests.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny
>> >><mmocny@chromium.org>
>> >> > >> wrote:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> Huzzah!
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without
the
>> >> cordova-js
>> >> > >> >>code
>> >> > >> >> needed for them to pass?  This is the downside of
multi-repo
>>:(
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> -Michal
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> >> > >> >><agrieve@chromium.org>wrote:
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >>> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged
them into
>> >>master
>> >> as
>> >> > >> >>>well.
>> >> > >> >>>
>> >> > >> >>> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms
without these
>> >> files.
>> >> > >> >>>
>> >> > >> >>>
>> >> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> >> > >><agrieve@chromium.org>
>> >> > >> >>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>>
>> >> > >> >>> > I think I've figured it out:
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js
(next) $ git
>> >>status
>> >> > >> >>> > # On branch next
>> >> > >> >>> > # Untracked files:
>> >> > >> >>> > #   (use "git add <file>..." to include
in what will be
>> >> committed)
>> >> > >> >>> > #
>> >> > >> >>> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
>> >> > >> >>> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
>> >> > >> >>> > nothing added to commit but untracked files
present (use
>>"git
>> >> > >>add" to
>> >> > >> >>> > track)
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> > Whoops!
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson
<
>> >> > >> gibson.becky@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> For added data,  I also  fail using
the tagged cordova-js
>> >> > >> >>> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a)
built locally.
>> >> > >> >>> >>
>> >> > >> >>> >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron
>> >><shazron@gmail.com>
>> >> > >> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js
on tag 2.5.0rc1
>> >>(hash
>> >> > >> >>> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a)
and I get the
>> >>same
>> >> > >> >>>results
>> >> > >> >>> as
>> >> > >> >>> >> > I've always had :/
>> >> > >> >>> >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM,
Andrew Grieve
>> >> > >> >>><agrieve@chromium.org
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js
it's working
>>fine...
>> >> > >> >>> >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32
PM, Shazron <
>> >> shazron@gmail.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone
Simulator debugging --
>> >> > >> >>>window.FileTransfer
>> >> > >> >>> is
>> >> > >> >>> >> not
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > defined, but I can do
a
>> >> > >> >>> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013
at 9:27 AM, Shazron
>> >> > >><shazron@gmail.com>
>> >> > >> >>> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > > Don't know what's
wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075
>>on
>> >>iOS
>> >> > >> >>> 2.5.0rc1 it
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > still
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > > all fails. Trying
iOS 2.4.0 (with latest
>>mob-spec),
>> >>it
>> >> > >>all
>> >> > >> >>> >> passes. I
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > > suspect its in the
cordova-js, not mob-spec
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20,
2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron
>> >> > >><shazron@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified
and re-downloaded
>>2.5.0rc1 of
>> >> iOS
>> >> > >>and
>> >> > >> >>> >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > of
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> mobile-spec,
created a new project - I get the
>>same
>> >> > >>results
>> >> > >> >>> as I
>> >> > >> >>> >> had
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > (both
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> in Simulator
and device as well).
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb
20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > agrieve@chromium.org
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> Just tried
the tests and they are all passing
>>for
>> >>me
>> >> > >>(on
>> >> > >> >>> >> simulator)
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> On Wed,
Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson
>><
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > gibson.becky@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > This
morning I did   git pull apache next for
>> >> > >> >>>mobile-spec
>> >> > >> >>> and
>> >> > >> >>> >> got
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > this:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Updating
3e3d075..842e603
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  VERSION
                             |  2 +-
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/file.tests.js
        | 14
>> >> > >> >>>++++++++++----
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js
| 27
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  cordova.js
                          |  2 +-
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  index.html
                          |  1 +
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/index.html
                     |  3
>>++-
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/page2.html
                     | 27
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  splashscreen/index.html
             | 47
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  8
files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18
>> >> deletions(-)
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  create
mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Does
that help?
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > On
Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <
>> >> > >> >>> shazron@gmail.com>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
That was my suspicion but i have no data on
>> >>this
>> >> > >>yet.
>> >> > >> >>> Which
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
mob-spec version? I can verify.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky
>>Gibson
>> >> > >>wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday
>> >> (using
>> >> > >>an
>> >> > >> >>> older
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > version)
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> and
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > I
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> only had one failure so maybe the issue
>>is
>> >>with
>> >> > >>the
>> >> > >> >>> tests
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> themselves.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM,
>>Shazron <
>> >> > >> >>> >> shazron@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then
>> >>copy :)
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal
>> >>Mocny
>> >> > >> >>>wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > Shaz how did you generate that text
>>file
>> >> > >>output?
>> >> > >> >>>  Did
>> >> > >> >>> >> you
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > open
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > remote
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > inspector and copy console output
>> >>manually?
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM,
>> >>Shazron <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > shazron@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> <javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS
>> >>running
>> >> > >>6.0.1
>> >> > >> >>>(to
>> >> > >> >>> >> rule
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > out
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> any
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
errors
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > due
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same
>> >>number of
>> >> > >> >>>errors
>> >> > >> >>> as
>> >> > >> >>> >> the
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> previous
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
two
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > devices.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM,
>> >> Shazron <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > shazron@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there
>>are
>> >>22
>> >> > >> >>> mobile-spec
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> failures
(21
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > related
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > to
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them
>> >> tomorrow
>> >> > >> >>>and
>> >> > >> >>> fix
>> >> > >> >>> >> > for a
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> re-tag.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
The
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached
>> >>as a
>> >> > >>text
>> >> > >> >>> file.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > Tested
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> on an
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > iPhone 5
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with
>>iOS
>> >> > >>5.1.1,
>> >> > >> >>> exact
>> >> > >> >>> >> > same
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > failures.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM,
>> >>Herm
>> >> > >>Wong <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> >
>> >> > >> >>>kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com<javascript:;><javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > From: shazron@gmail.com
>> >> <javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013
>>14:46:08
>> >> -0800
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > To:
>> >> > >>dev@cordova.apache.org<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for
>> >> > >> >>>Eye-Oh-Ess,
>> >> > >> >>> >> > wrapping
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> things
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > up.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55
>>AM,
>> >> Joe
>> >> > >> >>> Bowser <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
bowserj@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > <javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > Gone through the same
>>process
>> >>with
>> >> > >>Fil.
>> >> > >> >>>  If
>> >> > >> >>> >> we
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > fail,
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> we
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > fail
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> together!!!!
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at
>>11:50
>> >>AM,
>> >> > >>Filip
>> >> > >> >>> Maj <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > fil@adobe.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA
>>issues
>> >>for
>> >> > >> >>>2.5.0rc1
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > tagging.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next"
>> >>branch
>> >> > >> >>>under
>> >> > >> >>> the
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> javascript
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > and
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > tagged
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I
>> >>did it
>> >> > >> >>>right
>> >> > >> >>> :s
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM,
>>"Brian
>> >> > >>LeRoux" <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > b@brian.io
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> <javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets
>>aim
>> >>to
>> >> > >>get
>> >> > >> >>>this
>> >> > >> >>> >> thing
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
tagged/bagged
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > today.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at
>>11:23
>> >> AM,
>> >> > >> >>>Filip
>> >> > >> >>> >> Maj <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
fil@adobe.com<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > <javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But
>>let's do
>> >> it.
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM,
>>"Joe
>> >> > >>Bowser" <
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> bowserj@gmail.com
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
<javascript:;>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > wrote:
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work?
>> >>Do we
>> >> > >> >>>create
>> >> > >> >>> the
>> >> > >> >>> >> > next
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> branch
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
now
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > and
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> throw
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> > >
>> >> > >> >>> >> >
>> >> > >> >>> >>
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>> >
>> >> > >> >>>
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message