cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: more benchmarking in mobile-spec
Date Sat, 23 Feb 2013 00:13:28 GMT
It's all JS Fil. No, Java code. No reason why this wouldn't work on all
platforms.

The limitations I see is that we will never get an error condition as the
status is always 0 when reading from file://


Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald


On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> ... Wrapped in your own plugin..
>
> When stuff like this lands for ALL platforms then we can talk
>
> On 2/22/13 2:11 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Sure it does. I wrote code to do this on Sunday.
> >
> >
> http://simonmacdonald.blogspot.ca/2013/02/phonegap-android-xhrfilereader.h
> >tml
> >
> >Just double checked that if I send it the path
> >file:///mnt/sdcard/robots.txt I am able to get the contents of the text
> >file. Lemme know what the problem is.
> >
> >Although, I'm headed home right now.
> >
> >Simon Mac Donald
> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Xhr won't resolve to temp/persistent areas, at least on android :s
> >>
> >> On 2/22/13 1:54 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >What's XHR like reading something from the TEMP/PERSISTENT areas?
> >> >
> >> >Simon Mac Donald
> >> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Check out the latest commit to mobile-spec to see the auto benches.
I
> >> >>will
> >> >> work towards integrating with ci.cordova.io.. Eventually. There are
> >>so
> >> >> many things to do in that project, I could use volunteers :D
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyways, for a prelim auto bench result, here is what I get on my
> >>Galaxy
> >> >> Nexus running Android 4.2.2:
> >> >>
> >> >> Cordova.exec invocations (of Echo/echo plugin): ~3800 per second
> >> >> Cordova.exec callbacks coming back (from Echo/echo plugin): ~3600 per
> >> >> second
> >> >> XHR to the LICENSE file and get contents back (11kb) WITHIN the
> >> >> application www/ folder: ~2 per second
> >> >> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is
> >> >>stored
> >> >> on the TEMP FileSystem: ~135 per second
> >> >> Use FileReader to retrieve contents of LICENSE file (11kb) that is
> >> >>stored
> >> >> on the PERSISTENT FileSystem: ~140 per second
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> The FileReader tests create the LICENSE file before the start of the
> >> >> benchmarking, btw.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thoughts/comments/questions/feedback welcome.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2/20/13 8:29 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >It's not a bug-fix, so push to master :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> K I've got a little bit ready. Just benches:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1. The # of exec invocations possible in a time interval
> >> >> >> 2. The # of exec callback invocations possible in a time interval
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Now my conundrum is: where do I push this to? Next branch?
> >>Master? :(
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 2/19/13 12:16 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Awesome stuff Fil! The first one is one that I tried before
when
> >> >>doing
> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >bridge benchmark and found it to not get accurate results.
Had a
> >> >>look
> >> >> >>at
> >> >> >> >the README.md of the second one, and it sounds pretty
good.
> >>Looking
> >> >> >> >forward
> >> >> >> >to seeing what you come up with :)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Raising this thread from the dead :)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I'm thinking of either http://benchmarkjs.com/ or
> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/akdubya/uubench
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Both apparently support async which is our only requirement
> >>AFAIK.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Will mess aboot with adding both to mobile-spec and
seeing how
> >>it
> >> >> >>pans
> >> >> >> >>out.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On 10/26/12 11:09 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >eh folks, any thoughts on using
> >> >> >> >> >https://github.com/robohornet/robohornet for
benching?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message