cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:32:18 GMT
Could be the symbol mapping.
Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer is not
defined, but I can do a cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1 it still
> all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all passes. I
> suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and 2.5.0rc1 of
>> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I had (both
>> in Simulator and device as well).
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on simulator)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > This morning I did   git pull apache next for mobile-spec and got this:
>>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
>>> > Fast-forward
>>> >  VERSION                              |  2 +-
>>> >  autotest/tests/file.tests.js         | 14 ++++++++++----
>>> >  autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> >  cordova.js                           |  2 +-
>>> >  index.html                           |  1 +
>>> >  misc/index.html                      |  3 ++-
>>> >  misc/page2.html                      | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> >  splashscreen/index.html              | 47
>>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> >  8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>> >  create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>>> >
>>> > Does that help?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which
>>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version)
>>> and
>>> > I
>>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests
>>> themselves.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com
>>> > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output?  Did
you open
>>> > remote
>>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually?
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com
>>> > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to
rule out
>>> any
>>> > > errors
>>> > > > > due
>>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors
as the
>>> previous
>>> > > two
>>> > > > > > > devices.
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com
>>> > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec
>>> failures (21
>>> > > > > related
>>> > > > > > > to
>>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow
and fix for a
>>> re-tag.
>>> > > The
>>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text
file. Tested
>>> on an
>>> > > > > iPhone 5
>>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1,
exact same
>>> > failures.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong
<
>>> > > > > kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>
>>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > From: shazron@gmail.com <javascript:;>
<javascript:;>
>>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
>>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>>> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>> <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess,
wrapping
>>> things
>>> > up.
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM,
Joe Bowser <
>>> > > bowserj@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process
with Fil.  If we fail,
>>> we
>>> > fail
>>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
>>> > > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50
AM, Filip Maj <
>>> > fil@adobe.com
>>> > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues
for 2.5.0rc1 tagging.
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next"
branch under the
>>> javascript
>>> > and
>>> > > > > tagged
>>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope
I did it right :s
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian
LeRoux" <b@brian.io
>>> > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right.
Lets aim to get this thing
>>> > > tagged/bagged
>>> > > > > > > today.
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013
at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj <
>>> > > fil@adobe.com<javascript:;>
>>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change!
But let's do it.
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19
AM, "Joe Bowser" <
>>> bowserj@gmail.com
>>> > > <javascript:;>
>>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does
this work? Do we create the next
>>> branch
>>> > > now
>>> > > > > and
>>> > > > > > > >> throw
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>>> > > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message