cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:10 GMT
That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which
mob-spec version? I can verify.

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:

> Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version) and I
> only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests themselves.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
> >
> > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output?  Did you open remote
> > > inspector and copy console output manually?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out any errors
> > due
> > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the previous two
> > > > devices.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec failures (21
> > related
> > > > to
> > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a re-tag. The
> > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested on an
> > iPhone 5
> > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same failures.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong <
> > kingoftheoaks@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > From: shazron@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
> > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping things
up.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil.  If we fail,
we fail
> > > > >> together!!!!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the javascript
and
> > tagged
> > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
> > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io<javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing
tagged/bagged
> > > > today.
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj
<fil@adobe.com<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it.
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create
the next branch now
> > and
> > > > >> throw
> > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >>>
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message