cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposition to split cordova-blackberry into two separate plugins
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:10:42 GMT
I don't mind either way, but I think we should have at least an idea what
the cordova-blackberry10 repo should look like before we create it.
To separate them right now would mean creating two very similar
cordova-blackberry repos (everything the same except some build scripts).
And then later on, reconfiguring the cordova-blackberry10 repo to be
whatever.

So I'm basically for less work now :)

Also, on the topic of plugins for BlackBerry 10, I've done some work
recently on this that you can check out:

Here's my simple plugin that shows the structure for a BB10 plugin with
native code:
https://github.com/timkim/cordova.echo

A tool to build the C++ code from command line:
https://github.com/timkim/Renton

And plugman now has bb10 support so it should be able to install the
cordova.echo plugin:
https://github.com/imhotep/plugman




On 19 February 2013 14:55, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> I'm a little uncertain about the reasoning here. What happens when BB11
> ships? New repo?
>
> Generally we try to keep things in a vendor directory with
> the pertinent SDK's within. What is wrong w/ the current structure for
> contribution?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Also, any news when BB10 comes to Playbook, ballpark? --> "once BB10 is
> > ported to playbook"
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds fine to me.
> > >
> > > As for process, assuming there are no objections (would wait a couple
> > > days), file a JIRA issue on the INFRA project
> > > (issues.apache.org/jira/browser/INFRA)
> > >
> > > On 2/19/13 1:15 PM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" <jheifetz@rim.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >With all this talk of re-organizing cordova plugins we here at
> > BlackBerry
> > > >(RIM no more) have been discussing better alleging ourselves with the
> > > >approach by splitting our existing cordova-blackberry platform into
> two
> > > >separate platforms. (I saw a similar call here as well
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://callback.markmail.org/thread/xnhpidbnxg5ps7zr#query:+page:1+mid:xnh
> > > >pidbnxg5ps7zr+state:results)
> > > >
> > > >We propose adding a new platform, "blackberry10" with the longterm
> > > >understanding that once BB10 is ported to playbook the original repo
> > > >would only be for BBOS. Ideally the end result of this is that we
> would
> > > >have an up to date cordova-blackberry10 platform following all of the
> > > >best practices (plugins moved into their own repos, etc) and we can
> > > >better contribute resources to Cordova in general.
> > > >
> > > >Hopefully no one has any objections to this as structurally they are
> > > >really separate platforms. Additionally it'll make the flow within
> CLI a
> > > >lot cleaner.
> > > >
> > > >If everyone agrees, what is the process for getting a new apache repo
> > for
> > > >it?
> > > >
> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> > > >information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> > > >solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> > > >non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other
> than
> > > >the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> > > >transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and
> delete
> > > >this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution,
> or
> > > >reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
> > > >authorized and may be unlawful.
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Timothy Kim

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message