Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73294DC85 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9483 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2013 18:38:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 9461 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2013 18:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 9449 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2013 18:38:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:38:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.78 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.78] (HELO exprod6og127.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:37:56 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob127.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUQbFb6EG8HbbQaCuEErvzNhMCi9q5CRO@postini.com; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:37:35 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r0SIYX1v028982 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r0SIbSAp008359 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:37:30 -0800 From: Filip Maj To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:40:54 -0800 Subject: Re: best practice plugin authoring guidelines / window.plugins hate Thread-Topic: best practice plugin authoring guidelines / window.plugins hate Thread-Index: Ac39hodonFaOEIRWRguaplFE/la/GA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Don't think so. Should be up to the user. That said Cordova should provide a registration mechanism to enable collision detection (I think Andrew Grieve has something like this in his symbol mapping branch in cordova-js). On 1/28/13 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: >The community is starting to put plugins in their own repos (good). I >noticed this one today: > >https://github.com/vstirbu/InstagramPlugin > >(Awesome.) > >But I can't stand window.plugins any longer. I think this might be a >hangover from the existing plugin space but not totally sure---is >there a good reason to have the plugins global "namespace" anymore?