Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 310ADD7DF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38974 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2013 19:20:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 38947 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2013 19:20:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 38939 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2013 19:20:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:20:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.29] (HELO exprod6og112.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:20:13 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob112.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUOSIWP4jSF9r+vZuGTVqjGArGMLOKvYu@postini.com; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:19:52 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id r02JJpC9007471 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id r02JJnXM000488 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:19:49 -0800 From: Filip Maj To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:21:42 -0800 Subject: Re: 2.3.0 final? Thread-Topic: 2.3.0 final? Thread-Index: Ac3pHiHsWLWsFaO2Qp+J1ojWRBIJEg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'll set up the 2.3.0 tag issues in JIRA. On 1/2/13 10:15 AM, "Steven Gill" wrote: >Lets tag this week! > >On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > >> Early JAN release it is! I went into holiday mode early :P >> >> On 12/20/12 12:35 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" wrote: >> >> >Here's the chance to prove it doesn't take a week. Let's release 2.3.0 >>! >> >Today! >> > >> >Cheers, >> > Jesse >> > >> > >> >On 2012-12-19, at 12:05 PM, Jesse wrote: >> > >> >I would like to push 2.3.0 out before the break as well, before the >>end of >> >the week. >> >2.3.0 adds support for WP8, and while it IS currently available in >>rc2, it >> >would be nice if it was available as part of the download from >> >phonegap.com, >> >which means a release. As it is, Microsoft and I will have several >>blog >> >posts and videos alluding to 2.3.0 + WP8 but no link to go get it. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > >> >> Michael brought this up yesterday w/ the suggestion that we make >> >> cutting a release even easier still by including a standard ./release >> >> script (actually he suggested ./configure but I think that convention >> >> might come w/ unintended baggage). >> >> >> >> I'm not convinced the speed issue w/ cutting a release is the actual >> >> compile/compose we do today---but it would make the Coho tool >> >> significantly dumber which would make it way easier for downstream >> >> distributions to live w/ what we do. >> >> >> >> I'm realizing--this warrants a new thread---I'll kick that up. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Joe Bowser >>wrote: >> >> > Actually, given that it takes us a week to actually do a release, I >> >> > don't think we can get the final release out by the end of the >>week, >> >> > even though it appears activity on the repositories is slowing >>down. >> >> > :S >> >> > >> >> > I'll have to agree to a January release. >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Filip Maj wrote: >> >> >> It's getting awfully close to a break. I'm heading out on vacation >> >> >> tomorrow. >> >> >> >> >> >> How do people feel about letting rc2 simmer over the break and >> >>releasing >> >> >> 2.3 first thing January? >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12/19/12 10:10 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Can we start tagging the release today? >> >> >>> >> >> >>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Marcel Kinard >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> +1, FWIW. I'd like to see 2.3.0 out before the break. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -- Marcel Kinard >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On 12/17/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Hey >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> How about Wednesday/Thursday for tagging 2.3.0 final? I know >> >>that we >> >> >>>>> haven't fully released 2.3.0rc2, but I know that many, if not >>the >> >> >>>>> majority of the committers are going to be on holiday at the >>end >> >>of >> >> >>>>> this week and it would be good if we could get 2.3.0 out before >> >> break. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Thoughts? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Joe >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >@purplecabbage >> >risingj.com >> >>