Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEeF2TdsrT72HzJ29Hi-GuG06_RhuOEOPjBDScUNDRsC133L-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADVgkyMZmhcc8RbLNyNXi3cJ9iM=h9ScvU2ZnET3X4q9L95V1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CD19BDD4.158A2%fil@adobe.com>
	<CABiQX1WbsVx9W5DaxN-77_x5RAOHSodnsiRPxURzCgQLqMjXCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyMtbYhhpjLkEHv=ru3LiWp0TrrZ1HnbR9cKnzr4o+1aLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABiQX1UC+U9EkzS8U1mcnZAeNKfLz6iVe+ixW72EUXw=5EhBqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyND4nLsY4m9iQsp8xz_A2xVK4Gc+3232WZVeHtH==gEQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F4C1AE.2080401@gmail.com>
	<CAEeF2TfhN8tvBZAXw5OBVgMa3Lh7Qy2zEBDduwa7GN23k2xGuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyNqS8=3LOimqUpr2jY2zkxnZxFH3nWv6C9OZfQT_W=_jA@mail.gmail.com>
	<802B2A8E-1A09-4499-AB5C-FB336C797880@gmail.com>
	<CAEeF2TdsrT72HzJ29Hi-GuG06_RhuOEOPjBDScUNDRsC133L-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:32:45 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CADVgkyMPwWEVM+fMXXh5ba39iRMyFtqeh9VnmAyZrbQ76s0h9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: too long to package a release?
From: Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Becky: yes PST!

Michal: I can setup a bridge using either Gotomeeting (Citrix, Java)
or Connect (Adobe, Flash). Still a ways out from that WebRTC ideal.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
> Thanks for coordinating schedules Brain.  Im quite glad to be on EST :)
>
> We should also establish a medium: Google hangouts were not well received
> by everyone last year, (not everyone had a G+ account), but I cannot think
> of anything that is nearly as convenient.  Suggestions?
>
> -Michal
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Am I correct in assuming US pacific time zone?
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>>
>> > Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider
>> > times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand.
>> >
>> > I created a form to help us pick a time to talk.
>> >
>> > http://goo.gl/h9d1a
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made from
>> all
>> >> parties, but also some bike-shedding.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate some
>> of
>> >> the finer points, and to help come to some consensus?
>> >>
>> >> -Michal
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get deleted
>> >>> after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a long
>> period,
>> >>> or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's committer
>> >>> workflow.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed so
>> >>>> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels right
>> >>>> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits to
>> >>>> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature.
>> >>>> This would require more responsibility for the committer to keep track
>> >>>> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead.
>> >>>
>>