Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates
 209.85.219.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: agrieve@google.com
In-Reply-To: <5B23B58A-EA30-42C3-8003-5CA4A9358491@me.com>
References: <CD2D628E.16AEB%fil@adobe.com>
 <BFD37BBF-2DAE-4BC1-8E31-4FBCCCA61EA6@me.com>
 <CADjNb+=bA_caH51fCaCft+EQ+og7ixcVs6RWOumr=0uF03cAGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1UJMMyG6Dbaxt+eo_rzmcEwXwA8NwxT54XtWwNUbV7_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVgkyMiV=cXLqptTDa3nwhHRypSJdhCDORx6CDNSK+zHrDA7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XHqOWjG+z5-9u2L-y1TSTGbeXiuuWCy5Fs=-yG6Hzu6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-bN1PMrQFvFQx3W29E+A8rDpXG+OxDkpu-y76snNMAHzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5B23B58A-EA30-42C3-8003-5CA4A9358491@me.com>
From: Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:23:31 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CABiQX1XOXZfcavM1CRhCDJgJ1fXdrOoxJnZkfwJ_tLDqWnN5Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ship 2.4 monday
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93a1257fbb8c304d483182f

--14dae93a1257fbb8c304d483182f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fboulegue@me.com> wrote:

> Agree
>
> _____________________
> Fabian Boulegue
> tea inc.
> CEO - Founder
> Meierbrede 9
> 33100 Paderborn
>
> Mobile
>
> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
> > could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
> > it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
> >>
> >> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
> since
> >> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
> >>
> >> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
> generally
> >> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andrew: sounds great.
> >>>
> >>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> >>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> >>>
> >>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
> >> the
> >>>>> same version
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fboulegue@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
> >>> small
> >>>>>> group...?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> >>> committers in
> >>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> >>>>>> Monday?
> >>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -Steve
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> >>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
> >>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> >>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
> >> an
> >>>>> rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
> >>> iOS
> >>>>>>>>> repo
> >>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fboulegue@me.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> >>> here,
> >>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
> >>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> >>>>>>>>> releasing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
> >>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> >>> contributors
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> >>>>>>>>> from, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fboulegue@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >>
>

--14dae93a1257fbb8c304d483182f--