Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CB95E109 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44987 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2013 19:29:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 44881 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2013 19:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 44873 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2013 19:29:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fboulegue@me.com designates 17.172.220.239 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.172.220.239] (HELO st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com) (17.172.220.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:29:47 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.3] (ip-88-153-116-154.unitymediagroup.de [88.153.116.154]) by st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MHE007PEJGZMA40@st11p02mm-asmtp004.mac.com> for dev@cordova.apache.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:29:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-01-29_07:2013-01-29,2013-01-29,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1212290000 definitions=main-1301290171 Subject: Re: ship 2.4 monday References: From: fabian boulegue X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B143) In-reply-to: Message-id: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:29:24 +0100 To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small group...? _____________________ Fabian Boulegue tea inc. CEO - Founder Meierbrede 9 33100 Paderborn Mobile Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj : > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow. > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" wrote: > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on Monday? >> People interested in testing could just work off the source. >> >> -Steve >> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve >> wrote: >> >>> Changes of note: >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6. >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5 >>> >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>> >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS >>> repo >>>> recently (at least more than I have). >>>> >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, >>> about >>>>> the known issues. >>>>> So we would stay on time. >>>>> _____________________ >>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>> tea inc. >>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>> >>>>> Mobile >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj : >>>>> >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before >>> releasing >>>>>> 2.4.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would >>>>>>> warrant >>>>>>> an rc2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors >>> and >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over >>> from, or >>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent! >